|
Media Releases
|
Assembly Labor Committee Approves
Pharmacists' Conscience Clause
Madison, Wisconsin, USA
14 May, 2003
|
Related Links AB168
Testimony of
Testimony of
|
Madison - The Assembly Labor Committee gave their approval this morning to
Assembly Bill 63, legislation that will provide much needed job security for
pharmacists who conscientiously object to dispensing drugs or devices that
they reasonably believe would be used to cause death through
abortion,
euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, or any other method of intentionally
killing another human being. -30-
PRO-LIFE WISCONSIN |
|
|
Professor Prevails, Union Capitulates
|
Related Links
|
PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE 23 April, 2003 San Luis Obispo, CA - After a year of battling, the Cuesta College Federation of Teachers finally agreed to allow one of its professors to have all of his union dues diverted to a charity of his choice. Despite making repeated requests, Professor Paul Bauer had previously been denied the right to divert his mandatory "fair share" union fees to a charity that did not conflict with his religious convictions. The choice of charities to which the union had restricted this instructor were the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance, and a local scholarship fund that was clearly geared toward furthering labor union interests. Acting on behalf of the instructor, the Pacific Justice Institute made several written formal demands to the union that it either provide a list of acceptable charities, or allow the instructor to independently select his own desired charities. In order to prevent a lawsuit against them, the union finally capitulated. "I am relieved this is finally over," said Professor Bauer. "I did not want to go to trial, but would have if it had been necessary. I am extremely grateful to Pacific Justice Institute and their Affiliate Attorney Richard Kahdeman for their valuable representation." "Under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the unions not only have a legal obligation to refrain from discriminating on the basis of religion, they must reasonably accommodate the religious practices and beliefs of the employees they purportedly represent," said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. "Compliance with Title VII does not end with the union grudgingly agreeing to divert a religious objector's fees to charity. The whole purpose of accommodation would be defeated if an employee could be made to support an organization or fund that profoundly offends his religious convictions." The Pacific Justice Institute is a non-profit 501(c)(3) legal defense organization specializing in the defense of religious freedom, parental rights, and other civil liberties.
PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE |
|
|
![]() |
Protection
of Conscience Project www.consciencelaws.org NEWS RELEASE |
|
|
|
ADVISORY BOARD Dr. Shahid Athar, MD J. Budziszewski, PhD Dr. John Fleming, Dr. Henk Jochemsen, PhD David Novak, AB, MHL, PhD Lynn D. Wardle, JD ____________ PROJECT TEAM Michael Markwick
|
5 June, 2003 Court Puts Health Care Workers on the Spot A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Victoria makes it lawful to cause the death of patients by starvation and dehydration. The court has classified nutrition and hydration not as care, but as 'treatment' that can by refused by a patient or proxy. Australian health care workers who find this morally repugnant may now find themselves in a difficult position. "There are strong ethical traditions that identify nutrition and hydration as basic care that is owed to any human being," explained Sean Murphy, Administrator of the Protection of Conscience Project. "Those who work within these traditions would no more deprive patients of food and water than take their beds and blankets." The decision in Melbourne involved a 68 year old woman suffering from a fatal form of dementia known as Pick's Disease, and has spent the past three years in a vegetative state. Author Wesley J. Smith cites the case of Marjorie Nighbert, not terminally ill, who was admitted to a Florida nursing home following a stroke. Her feeding tube was removed on instructions from her brother. As she began to feel the effects of dehydration and hunger she begged, "Please feed me . . . I’m hungry, I’m thirsty." Nursing staff secretly slipped her small amounts of food and water. The case was eventually reviewed by a judge, who ordered the process continued. She died in April, 1995. "Even if this is considered acceptable public policy," said Murphy, "dissenting health care workers and institutions should not be forced to participate in what they may consider to be judicially authorized euthanasia." -30-
|
|
|
Media |
July-Dec 2003 |
Jul-Dec 2002 |