Search the Project Site

 
 
Examining the Issues
Circumstances Indicating Potential for Conflict
-Contraception-
 

Map

Traduire à français         Tradurre all'italiano         Traduzca al español         Traduza a português            Übersetzen Sie zu Deutsch     Oversett til Norsk

Testimony of Pharmacist Re: Wisconsin Assembly  Bill 63
Before the Assembly Labour Committee, 5 March, 2003

Related Links
SB 63

Police Used to
Intimidate Objecting
Pharmacist

Disciplinary Proceedings
Against Neil Noesen, RPH
Final Decision and Order

Neil Noesen v Department of
 Regulation and Licensing 
& Pharmacy Examining Board-
Appeal Brief

Pharmacist appeals Wisconsin
 Pharmacy Examining Board’s
 Final Disciplinary Decision

Service or Servitude:
 Reflections on
 Freedom of Conscience
for Health Care Workers

Freedom of Conscience
and the Needs
of the Patient

Establishment Bioethics

Referral:
 A False Compromise

Grosskreuz
Testimony
Re; AB63

Klubertanz
T
estimony
 Re: SB 21

Project Letter
to Cybercast News

Pharmacy Colleges
Quash
 Conscientious
 Objection

General practice
docs and obstetrics

Accommodating conscience

Medical Students
 for Choice

Pamphlet-
 Morning After Pill

MAP Poses
Dilemma for
 Some MD's

K-Mart
Pharmacist Fired

Project Report
 2001-01

In Defence
of the New Heretics

Autonomy, Justice,
and Accommodation

Project Letter
 to the Editor,
 Daily News
(Halifax, N.S.),

Project Letter
 to the Editor
(BC Medical Journal)

Project Letter
to the  Editor
 (Globe and Mail)

Project Letter
to t
he Editor
(Pharmacy Practice)

Project Letter
 to t
he Editor
 (Canadian Pharmaceutical
Journal)

Editorial- (Canadian Pharmaceutical
Journal)

Project Letter
 to the Editor
(Pharmacy Practice)

Project Letter
 to the Editor
(Canadian Pharmaceutical
Journal)

Project Letter
to the Editor
(The Province)

Project Letter
 to the Editor
(Pharmacy Practice)

Project letter
 to the Editor
(Pharmacy Practice)

Project Letter
to the Editor
 (Winnipeg Sun)

Project Letter
to the
Editor
(Globe & Mail)

Neil Noesen, R.Ph.

As a pharmacist highly dedicated to the advancement of the profession of pharmacy practice, I express my strong support for Representative Owen’s Assembly Bill 63.  I am a native born Wisconsinite, a University of Wisconsin – Madison graduate, and a proud holder of a license to practice pharmacy in the state of Wisconsin.

With a license to practice pharmacy in the state of Wisconsin, I have been allowed the great privilege to offer pharmaceutical care for the sick.  This great privilege comes with great responsibility.  I take my responsibility to care, my duty to care, very seriously. 

This sense of duty is shared amongst all of us Wisconsin pharmacists.  We first have the duty to do no harm.  Then, the duty to do good.  Finally, there remains an ethical imperative for the recognition of the individual autonomy of the patient as well as the recognition of the professional autonomy of the practitioner. 

Just as it is unethical for us to force our patients who are adults to adhere to a drug regimen, so is it also unethical to force practitioners to participate in specific actions involving what they believe would be a cooperation with abortions, assisted suicides, and euthanasia.  Assembly Bill 63 recognizes this professional autonomy and upholds the dignity and worth that we all share in our common humanity. 

Some of us pharmacists practicing in Wisconsin have certain objections to involvement in drug therapy that we believe could cause an abortion such as the morning after pill.  Some of us may also object to specific cases, in which after consulting with the prescriber, we believe that a certain drug regimen would be used to cause the death of an individual rather than to have a comforting effect as its primary goal of therapy.

Assembly Bill 63 is specific to these cases outlined above and would simply be giving legal recognition to the professional autonomy that we already hold as pharmacists.  This legislation is vital to the recognition of our professional autonomy, vital to facilitating arrangements of accommodations that are reasonable between pharmacists and their employers, and vital to the advancement of our practice of pharmacy in the state of Wisconsin.  Let’s keep moving forward.

Kindly consider supporting this necessary and long overdue piece of legislation.


Note:
Noesen faces discipline from the Wisconsin Pharmacy Examining Board for having acted on his convictions.  See Police Used to Intimidate Objecting Pharmacist.

Sean Murphy, Administrator
Protection of Conscience Project

Back Next