Psychologists criticised in CIA torture report
Bioedge, 14 December, 2014
Two psychologists contracted by the CIA to create enhanced interrogation
techniques for al-Qaeda detainees have come under fire for violating human
rights and medical ethics. Although pseudonyms were used in the 480-page
report published this week by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence,
it was clearly referring to
Bruce Jessen and James Mitchell, who were paid US$81 million for their
Both Jessen and Mitchell had worked on the military's Survival,
Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) program in which soldiers are trained
to endure brutal mock interrogations, including waterboarding. After 9/11
they were asked to design an interrogation program.
Despite the opprobrium heaped on them, the two men cannot respond
directly to the criticisms in the report because they have signed
non-disclosure agreements. "I'm in a box -- I'm caught in some Kafka novel,"
Mitchell, who is now retired and living in Florida,
told Bloomberg. "Everyone is assuming it is me, but I can't confirm or
deny it. It is frustrating because you can't defend yourself."
But he defended the broad aims of the program he helped to design.
"The people who think the men and woman in the CIA are doing the heavy
lifting for them so they can sleep safe at night, those people I get a
lot of positive comments from. Then there are the people who think it
would be better that 3,000 people die than that KSM [Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed] get slapped and they don't care because it isn't going to be
them who is dying. They just don't care."
The techniques they designed were based on the notion of "learned
helplessness", which was developed in the 1960s with dogs by Martin Seligman
(who is mortified by his indirect link with torture). People who face
unending adversity eventually become depressed and give up attempts to
improve their situation. The CIA's psychologists thought that this state
would encourage detainees to become cooperative and volunteer information.
Physicians for Human Rights was highly critical of the participation of
health professionals in all stages of the CIA's program. Their involvement
in monitoring the torture techniques was central to providing legal
protection to interrogators, said PHR, as torture could then be described as
"safe, legal, and effective".
"They were complicit at every step, including designing the torture
techniques, monitoring the infliction of severe physical and mental pain,
and failing to document clear evidence of harm,"
said Dr Vincent Iacopino, PHR's senior medical advisor. "What happened
was unethical, unlawful, and immoral, and we must ensure it never happens
article is published by
BioEdge.org under a Creative Commons licence. You may
republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for
non-commercial purposes following
these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that
your department make a donation to Bioedge. Commercial media
must contact us for
permission and fees. Some articles on the Bioedge site are
published under different terms.