<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<generator>Feed Editor</generator>
	<pubDate>18 Feb 2012 16:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
	<title>Protection of Conscience Project</title>
	<description>An initiative supporting freedom of conscience in health care.</description>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org</link>
	<language>en-us</language>
	
	<item>
	<title>White House Promises for 2012</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/span&gt;  |  This statement from the White House reaffirms the regulation that will compel objecting employers to provide insurance for sterilization and birth control, and a year's &amp;quot;grace period.&amp;quot;  It makes a number of promises about a new regulation that will not be in place until after US presidential election in 2012 </description>
	<pubDate>11 Feb 2012 07:15:20 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002b.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">8F2041F4-1B25-4EF4-9C94-297DC8ABC2B2</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>President Obama announces promise to accommodate objecting employers</title>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  President Barack Obama and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius held a news conference today and promised to revise a regulation that has ignited a firestorm of protest across the United States. However, the details provided in the &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002b.html"&gt;White House &amp;quot;Fact Sheet&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; suggest that the administration is simply reaffirming &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;the existing regulation&lt;/a&gt; while making a promise work with objecting institutions to find a compromise during a one-year grace period. This is essentially what Secretary Sebelius &lt;a href="http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2012pres/01/20120120a.html"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; on 20 January. What is new is the suggestion that coverage might be offered by insurance companies without the active participation of employers who object. When developing the proposal, the administration did not consult with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which has been the most determined and vociferous critic of the regulation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The proposal was not published in the United States Federal Register on 10 February, as promised by the &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002b.html"&gt;White House &amp;quot;Fact Sheet&amp;quot;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>11 Feb 2012 05:34:49 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#President_Obama_announces_promise_to_accommodate_objecting_employers</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">29CC624E-3F99-467A-B732-C095469AA1EF</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Hawaii cited as model of possible compromise in birth control insurance controversy</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News &lt;/span&gt; |  A Hawaiian law concerning insurance for contraceptive coverage has been cited as a model for a possible compromise between the Obama administration and religious groups that have made clear that they will resist or refuse to obey its new birth control &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;regulation&lt;/a&gt;. Organizations in Hawaii that object to contraception for religious reasons may decline to provide health insurance coverage for it if they advise employees that it is not available and tell them where coverage can be obtained. It is reported that it is generally successful, but that there are some problems with the arrangement. [&lt;a href="http://ncronline.org/news/politics/hawaiis-contraception-model-has-downsides-some-say"&gt;NCR&lt;/a&gt;] The issue of referral may also be a source of difficulty.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Feb 2012 05:26:04 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Hawaii_cited_as_model_of_possible_compromise_in_birth_control_insurance_controversy</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">3F8371AF-7152-4392-A5DD-F321A7CF6DE5</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Christian Medical Association: Contraception mandate fits pattern of assaults on conscience and religious liberty</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News Release&lt;/span&gt;  |  The 16,000-member Christian Medical Association today issued a statement asserting that the government's mandate of contraception coverage nationwide fits a growing pattern of assaulting and restricting First Amendment freedoms of conscience and faith. . .</description>
	<pubDate>10 Feb 2012 05:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Christian_Medical_Association:_Contraception_mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">ADC91EA0-B66D-4672-9FA0-452C2ECE09CC</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Michigan takes lead role in lawsuits against unconstitutional Obama health care mandate</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News Release&lt;/span&gt;  |  Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette today announced Michigan will be the lead state in an effort to defend religious liberty in three separate lawsuits filed by &lt;a href="http://www.becketfund.org/"&gt;The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty&lt;/a&gt; on behalf of two colleges and a religious broadcasting network challenging onerous administrative health care &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;regulations&lt;/a&gt; recently handed down by the Obama administration. . .</description>
	<pubDate>10 Feb 2012 05:18:03 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Michigan_Takes_Lead_Role_in_Lawsuits_Against_Unconstitutional_Obama_Health_Care_Mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">404E6EA3-2813-4BAF-A9D5-BEEC5125C220</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>State of Michigan joins suits against HHS regulation</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  The Attorney General of Michigan has announced that the state will file briefs in support of three court cases that have been launched to stop the Obama administration from forcing objecting employers to pay for insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. [&lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/releases/releases-2012.html#Michigan_Takes_Lead_Role_in_Lawsuits_Against_Unconstitutional_Obama_Health_Care_Mandate"&gt;News release&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>10 Feb 2012 05:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#State_of_Michigan_to_joins_suits_against_HHS_regulation</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">CDC572A0-7724-4C3C-9967-D0192D516E43</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>SB 2092 Religious Freedom Protection Act of 2012</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;Proposed Law &lt;/span&gt; |  A BILL To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to provide conscience protections for individuals and organizations.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Feb 2012 05:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal15.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">255C05CA-7D97-4C60-80AC-0DC072D364A8</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>New bill in US Senate to stop HHS regulation</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  Senators Joe Manchin and Mario Rubio have introduced &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org./laws-proposed/usa/federal15.htm"&gt;&amp;quot;Bill S2092 -the Religious Freedom Protection Act of 2012.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; The bill is drafted to stop the Department of Health and Human Services regulation enacted by the Obama administration for the purpose of forcing employers to pay for insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. The bill offers protection to individuals and entities opposed to facilitating such services for reasons of conscience or religion.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Feb 2012 05:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#New_bill_in_US_Senate_to_stop_HHS_regulation</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">3A1A54E7-032D-4AF9-B755-865FB20E41CC</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Virtually all US Catholic bishops have denounced HHS contraceptive mandate</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News &lt;/span&gt; | Virtually every Catholic bishop in the United States who heads a diocese has spoken out against the Obama administration's &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;regulation&lt;/a&gt; that will force employers to provide insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. Many have stated that they will not comply with the law. [ See &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/maps/usa-hhs-01.html"&gt;Map of institutions resisting the HHS 'contraceptive' mandate&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>10 Feb 2012 05:10:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Virtually_all_US_Catholic_bishops_have_denounced_HHS_contraceptive_mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">3E19CC81-BDEC-4B59-8E24-C26555450C3D</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Nebraska will sue to prevent forced birth control</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning has written to Attorneys General in the other 49 US states inviting them to join a court case that will be launched by Nebraska to stop the Obama administration from forcing objecting employers to pay for insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. He described the adminstration &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;regulation&lt;/a&gt; as &amp;quot;an unconscionable intrusion on religious liberties.&amp;quot; [&lt;a href="http://www.nola.com/hurricane/indexQS.ssf?/newsflash/index.ssf/story/neb-ag-vows-to-sue-over-new-contraception-policy/707457979d824d639acbe5ea452a32da"&gt;Associated Press]&lt;/a&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>9 Feb 2012 05:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Nebraska_will_sue_to_prevent_forced_birth_control_coverage</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">57377625-BF79-4201-8C04-DF461D7CC5E6</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Prominent Evangelical Christian leader supports Catholic opposition to forced birth control regulation</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  Rick Warren, a &lt;a href="http://pastors.com/about/"&gt;prominent Evangelical Christan pastor&lt;/a&gt;, has published a &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/#%21/RickWarren/status/167072427300487168"&gt;&amp;quot;tweet&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; stating, &amp;quot;I'm not a Catholic but I stand in 100% solidarity with my brothers &amp;amp; sisters to practice their belief against govt pressure.&amp;quot;</description>
	<pubDate>8 Feb 2012 05:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Prominent_Evangelical_Christian_leader_supports_Catholic_opposition_to_forced_birth_control_regulation</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">64099346-09D2-459B-8AED-46478E7347B2</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Southern Baptists denounce forced birth control insurance</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News &lt;/span&gt; |  A &lt;a href="http://erlc.com/article/on-the-obama-administrations-abortion-rule/"&gt;statement&lt;/a&gt; from the Southern Baptists has denounced the Obama administration's &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;regulation&lt;/a&gt; that will force employers to provide insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. The statement describes the regulation as &amp;quot;a clear violation of our nation’s commitment to liberty of conscience and a flagrant violation of our constitutional protection to freedom of religion.&amp;quot; It was signed by Richard Land, President of the Southern Baptist's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission since 1988, and Barrett Duke one of the Commission's directors.</description>
	<pubDate>8 Feb 2012 04:52:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Southern_Baptists_denounce_forced_birth_control_insurance</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">01162738-5FB5-4435-B893-5C4CAF15A507</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>154 members of US Congress protest HHS regulation forcing birth control coverage</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News &lt;/span&gt; |  154 members of the US House of Representatives from both Democratic and Republican parties have signed a &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/archive/documents/2012-02-06-154-letter-sebelius.pdf"&gt;letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius&lt;/a&gt; stating that the &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;regulation&lt;/a&gt; that forces objecting employers to provide insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs is &amp;quot;an unprecedented overreach by the federal government that infringes upon rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.&amp;quot; They asked that the regulation be suspended until it is certain that employers and individuals &amp;quot;are afforded their constitutionally protected rights.&amp;quot;</description>
	<pubDate>7 Feb 2012 04:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#154_members_of_US_Congress_protest_HHS_regulation_forcing_birth_control_coverage</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">9B13622E-56E9-4922-B618-7A2EF562B7F4</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Sebelius defends forced coverage: USA Today editorial opposes it</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News &lt;/span&gt; |  Writing in &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt;, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/story/2012-02-05/Kathleen-Sebelius-contraception-exemption/52975092/1"&gt;has defended her plan&lt;/a&gt; to force employers to pay for insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. She avoids the issue of coercion of employers entirely and claims that the narrow 'religious exemption' is adequate, despite nationwide protests to the contrary [See &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/maps/usa-hhs-01.html"&gt;Map of institutions resisting the HHS &amp;quot;preventive services&amp;quot; mandate&lt;/a&gt;]. The &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/story/2012-02-05/contraception-mandate-religious-freedom/52975796/1"&gt;&lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt; editorial&lt;/a&gt; stated that &amp;quot;the Obama administration didn't just cross&amp;quot; the line separating church and stated, but &amp;quot;galloped over it, requiring employers affiliated with the Catholic Church to include free birth control in their health insurance plans.&amp;quot;</description>
	<pubDate>6 Feb 2012 04:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Sebelius_defends_forced_coverage:_USA_Today_editorial_opposes_it</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">BBE4247B-4EF4-4BEA-919F-73D69DAF0077</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Presidential hopeful promises to revoke forced birth control regulation</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  Mitt Romney, one of the front-runners seeking nomination as the Republican Party's candidate in the 2012 presidential election, has spoken out in support of Catholic bishops opposing the Obama administration's &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;regulation&lt;/a&gt; that will force employers with over 50 employees to provide insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. He states, &amp;quot;Such rules don’t belong in the America that I believe in.&amp;quot; [&lt;a href="http://m.mittromney.com/blogs/mitts-view/2012/02/president-obama-versus-religious-liberty"&gt;Romney Blog&lt;/a&gt;] However, opponents may recall that, while governor of Massachusetts, he refused to exempt Catholic hospitals from a requirement to dispense the morning-after pill to rape complainants.[&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/12/09/romney_says_no_hospitals_are_exempt_from_pill_law/?page=2"&gt;Boston Globe&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>4 Feb 2012 04:46:33 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Presidential_hopeful_promises_to_revoke_forced_birth_control_regulation</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">86915F6C-5876-4FF2-ABA1-6F4CDAC0C72D</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Archbishop's letter to congregation censored by US military authorities</title>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News &lt;/span&gt; |  Archbishop Timothy Broglio, who is in charge of Catholic chaplains in the U.S. military, asked them to read to their congregations at mass a pastoral letter protesting the Obama administration's plan to force employers with over 50 employees to provide insurance coverage for surgical sterilization, contraceptives, and embryocidal drugs. The letter, like many of those from other US Catholic bishops read from pulpits across the country, stated, &amp;quot;We cannot—we will not—comply with this unjust law.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Army's Office of the Chief of Chaplains sent an e-mail ordering Catholic chaplains not to read the letter, directing them to mention it in bulletins and have printed copies available. A number of chaplains are reported to have disobeyed the order, while others contacted the Archbishop. The Archbishop spoke to the Secretary of the Army, who confirmed that the Chief of Chaplains had acted improperly. As a result of the discussion with the Secretary, a censored version of the letter was read to congregations. The &lt;a href="http://www.milarch.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=dwJXKgOUJiIaG&amp;amp;b=7656203&amp;amp;ct=11609821"&gt; original&lt;/a&gt; is available on the military archdiocese website. [&lt;a href="http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=44681"&gt;CNS News&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>4 Feb 2012 04:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Archbishops_letter_to_congregation_censored_by_US_military_authorities</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">3F25CD19-0E79-42D7-BDEE-6F88AA615C2E</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Speaker of US House of Representatives considers HHS mandate unconstitutional</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt; | U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner has stated that he believes the HHS &amp;quot;preventive services&amp;quot; contraceptive &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065-002.html"&gt;mandate&lt;/a&gt; violates the U.S. constitution, and expressed hope that the Obama administration would reconsider it. White House Press Secretary said that the issue was not being reconsidered: &amp;quot; the decision has been made.&amp;quot; [ &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/boehner-feds-back-off-birth-control-order-165212021.html"&gt;Associated Press&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>3 Feb 2012 04:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Speaker_of_U.S._House_considers_HHS_mandate_unconstitutional</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">6BAFFE11-4E5F-4A57-BA87-7ADC2E5A8653</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>EU Commmissioner for Human rights supports right to conscientious objection</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  | Thomas Hammarberg, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, has issued a statement supporting the exercise of conscientious objection to military service. He argues that objectors should be given a &amp;quot;genuinely civilian&amp;quot; alternative to compulsory military service, not imprisoned. [&lt;a href="https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CommDH-PR007(2012)&amp;amp;Language=lanEnglish&amp;amp;Ver=original&amp;amp;BackColorInternet=C3C3C3&amp;amp;BackColorIntranet=EDB021&amp;amp;BackColorLogged=F5D383"&gt;CE press release&lt;/a&gt;] The comment is of interest because a number of commentators on freedom of conscience in health care have suggested that conscientious objectors should be willing to suffer for their convictions, making explicit reference to imprisonment. [See, for example, the reference in &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical052.html"&gt;The Silence of Good People&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>3 Feb 2012 04:40:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#EU_Commissioner_for_Human_Rights_supports_right_to_conscientious_objection</link>
	<category>Europe-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">A0963E68-61FC-4267-94E5-93E852CCC5CB</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Erroneous assumptions illustrated by editorial</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  In an editorial titled, "Birth Control: Now a human right," the Charleston Gazette has expressed support for the Obama administrations regulation that will force objecting employers to provide insurance coverage for "contraceptive services."The editorial illustrates five common unexamined and questionable assumptions frequently made by opponents of freedom of conscience in health care.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Feb 2012 04:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Erroneous_assumptions_illustrated_by_editorial_</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">4369BE38-8CD8-4B78-AE02-455123DE71C5</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Prominent Southern Baptist protests HHS mandate</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, has praised the willingness of Catholic bishops to go to jail rather than conform to the HHS regulation requiring them to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives, surgical sterilization and potential embryocides. Mohler said, "[E]veryone who stands both for the sanctity of human life and for the mandate of religious liberty must express outrage in whatever form is available to us to the president of the United States.”</description>
	<pubDate>31 Jan 2012 07:05:36 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Prominent_Southern_Baptist_protests_HHS_mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">89E42F12-0FA7-4100-9D05-4F72F8051CA4</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>White House press secretary downplays revolt over HHS mandate</title>
	<description>&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;News&lt;/span&gt;  |  White House Press Secretary Jay Carney states that he does not think that the Department of Health and Human Services regulation requiring employers to pay for insurance coverage for &amp;quot;contraceptive services&amp;quot; raises any constitutional issues. He also claims that the Obama administration supports "existing conscience protections." He was responding to a question from a reporter who described the adverse response of the American Catholic bishops as "a pretty extraordinary situation." Many of the bishops have said that they will not comply with the law. Asked if that would have consquences, Carney avoided the question.</description>
	<pubDate>31 Jan 2012 07:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#White_House_press_secretary_downplays_revolt_over_HHS_mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">12CAA1F2-B1C4-4620-9B80-D59F5E46F439</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 2012</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt; | Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 2012</description>
	<pubDate>31 Jan 2012 20:15:27 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal14.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal14.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Rubio introduces bill to repeal Obamacare mandate against religious freedom</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Senator Marco Rubio&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) today introduced the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 2012, a bill to repeal a new ObamaCare mandate that violates the religious liberties and conscience rights of faith-based institutions by forcing them to offer employees insurance coverage for contraceptives.</description>
	<pubDate>31 Jan 2012 20:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Rubio_Introduces_Bill_To_Repeal_ObamaCare_Mandate_Against_Religious_Freedom</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Rubio_Introduces_Bill_To_Repeal_ObamaCare_Mandate_Against_Religious_Freedom</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Ohio politicians reject or support freedom of conscience in health care</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; Interviewed by the editorial board of the Toledo Blade about the federal government's regulation that will force objecting employers to pay for contraceptive and embryocidal drugs, a candidate for the nomination of the Democratic Party commented "It seems to me if we can land a man on the moon and if we can figure out how to take out Osama Bin Laden, we ought to be able to find a way to do this,</description>
	<pubDate>31 Jan 2012 20:10:16 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Ohio_politicians_reject_or_support_freedom_of_conscience_in_health_care</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Ohio_politicians_reject_or_support_freedom_of_conscience_in_health_care</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Over half of Catholic bishops in USA have spoken out against new law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; According to a Catholic blog, over half of the Catholic bishops who are in charge of dioceses in the United States have spoken out publicly against the Obama administration's plan to force employers to pay for contraceptive, embryocidal drugs and devices.</description>
	<pubDate>31 Jan 2012 20:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Over_half_of_Catholic_bishops_in_USA_have_spoken_out_against_new_law</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Over_half_of_Catholic_bishops_in_USA_have_spoken_out_against_new_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill introduced in US Senate to stop HHS regulation</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; In response to the Obama administration's plan to suppress the exericse of freedom of conscience by individuals and groups opposed to contraceptives, embryocidal and abortificaient drugs and services, Senator Mario Rubio of Florida has introduced the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 2012 in the U.S. Senate.</description>
	<pubDate>31 Jan 2012 20:07:53 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_US_Senate_to_stop_HHS_regulation</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_US_Senate_to_stop_HHS_regulation</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>This conscience thing</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;W. James Antle, III&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Has President Obama's Department of Health and Human Services awakened a sleeping giant?&amp;nbsp; In pews across America, Catholics listened yesterday to letters from their bishops denouncing an HHS requirement that forces virtually every employer in America to pay for health insurance that covers contraception, sterilization, and embryocides.</description>
	<pubDate>30 Jan 2012 20:11:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#This_Conscience_Thing</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#This_Conscience_Thing</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US bishops encourage protests, promise defiance of new law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; Catholic bishops in the United States are having letters are being read to their congregations to encourage protests against the Obama administration's plan to force employers to pay for contraceptive and embryocidal drugs and devices. Bishop Zubick of Pittsburgh wrote that the federal government has basically told Catholics, "To hell with you!", while Bishop Leonard P. Blair of Toledo, Ohio, stated, "We cannot - we will not - comply with this unjust law."</description>
	<pubDate>30 Jan 2012 17:02:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#US_bishops_encourage_protests,_promise_defiance_of_new_law</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#US_bishops_encourage_protests,_promise_defiance_of_new_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Decision unchanged on HHS exemptions: HHS edict will force Catholics to violate conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; It is really hard to believe that it happened. It comes like a slap in the face. The Obama administration has just told the Catholics of the United States, &amp;ldquo;To Hell with you!” There is no other way to put it.</description>
	<pubDate>29 Jan 2012 17:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#Decision_unchanged_on_HHS_exemptions</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#Decision_unchanged_on_HHS_exemptions</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Kansas House Bill 2523 (2012)</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; AN ACT concerning abortion; amending K.S.A. 65-443 and K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 65-444 and repealing the existing sections.</description>
	<pubDate>28 Jan 2012 11:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/kansas04.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/kansas04.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Jewish groups warn US federal government plan harms freedom of religion</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Rabbi Abba Cohen, vice president for federal government affairs and Washington director of Agudath Israel, has criticized the Obama administration’s decision to force employers to pay for contraceptive, embryocidal drugs and devices even if they object to doing so for reasons of conscience. Nathan Diament, executive director of public policy for the Orthodox Union, expressed concern about the notion that religious belief that does not remain "insular" is not really religious belief.</description>
	<pubDate>28 Jan 2012 11:38:35 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Jewish_groups_warn_US_federal_government_plan_harms_freedom_of_religion</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Jewish_groups_warn_US_federal_government_plan_harms_freedom_of_religion</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Council of Europe asserts that euthanasia must always be prohibited</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; In a document addressing the issue of advance directives, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe included the statemenet, "Euthanasia, in the sense of the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit, must always be prohibited."</description>
	<pubDate>26 Jan 2012 16:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Council_of_Europe_asserts_that_euthanasia_must_always_be_prohibited</link>
	<category>Europe-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Council_of_Europe_asserts_that_euthanasia_must_always_be_prohibited</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill introduced in Kansas</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; A protection of conscience bill introduced by Rep. Steve Brunk in the Kansas House of Representatives is intended to ensure that medical professionals who refuse to participate in abortion are not fired or demoted.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 16:02:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_Kansas</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_Kansas</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Spanish government to revise abortion law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | The new Spanish government, which replaced the former socialist government in November elections, plans to revise the country's abortion law. It had promised to "change the current legislative model relating to abortion in order to reinforce the protection of the right to life as well as female minors".</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 16:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Spanish_government_to_revise_abortion_law</link>
	<category>Spain-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Spanish_government_to_revise_abortion_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Obama administration's attack on Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Casey Mattox&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Thirty-nine years ago the United States Supreme Court recognized that medical professionals, let alone others, have a right not to assist in abortions in violation of their conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 21:03:23 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#The_Obama_Administrations_Attack_on_Roe_v._Wade_and_Doe_v._Bolton</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#The_Obama_Administrations_Attack_on_Roe_v._Wade_and_Doe_v._Bolton</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Bishops decry HHS rule, urge Catholics to stand up for religious liberty</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Both the president of the U.S. bishops and the bishops’ Pro-Life chairman called on the thousands of Catholics gathered for the National Prayer Vigil for Life to speak out for the protection of conscience rights and religious liberty.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 21:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Bishops_Decry_HHS_Rule,_Urge_Catholics_to_Stand_Up_for_Religious_Liberty_and_Conscience_Rights</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Bishops_Decry_HHS_Rule,_Urge_Catholics_to_Stand_Up_for_Religious_Liberty_and_Conscience_Rights</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Cardinal-Designate Dolan speaks out against HHS rule, calls for action</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan of New York, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), sharply criticized the decision by the Obama administration in which it &amp;ldquo;ordered almost every employer and insurer in the country to provide sterilization and contraceptives, including some abortion-inducing drugs, in their health plans.” He made the statement in a web video posted at: http://bcove.me/ob5itz9v. . .</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 21:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Cardinal-Designate_Dolan_Speaks_Out_Against_HHS_Rule</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Cardinal-Designate_Dolan_Speaks_Out_Against_HHS_Rule</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US bishops vow to fight HHS edict</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |The Catholic bishops of the United States called &amp;ldquo;literally unconscionable” a decision by the Obama Administration to continue to demand that sterilization, embryocides and contraception be included in virtually all health plans.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:59:09 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#U.S._Bishops_Vow_to_Fight_HHS_Edict</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#U.S._Bishops_Vow_to_Fight_HHS_Edict</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>New Hampshire House Bill 1653 (2012)</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt; | It is the purpose of this act to protect as a basic civil right the right of all health care providers and/or institutions, to decline to counsel, advise, pay for, provide, perform, assist, or participate in providing or performing health care services that violate their consciences.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:57:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/newhampshire02.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/newhampshire02.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Missouri Senate Bill 657 (2012)</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA-Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; To amend chapter 191, RSMo, by adding thereto five new sections relating to the conscience rights of all individuals who provide medical services.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/missouri03.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/missouri03.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Moral Courage in the Practice of Medicine</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Conference&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians' Societies&lt;/strong&gt; | The Metropolitan Hotel, Vancouver, B.C. 27-28 April, 2012</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/notices/notices-01.html#Moral_Courage_in_the_Practice_of_Medicine</link>
	<category>Conference</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/notices/notices-01.html#Moral_Courage_in_the_Practice_of_Medicine</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill in New Hampshire</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; A protection of conscience bill has been proposed in New Hampshire, one of only three states that lack protective legislation for health care workers. House Bill 1653 offers protection for individuals, though not for institutions. It is opposed by Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Association.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:40:18 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_in_New_Hampshire</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_in_New_Hampshire</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Tanzanian bill proposes to enforce 'access to reproductive health services'</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; A Bill to Enact the Safe Motherhood Law (2012) will be proposed in Tanzania in February for the purpose of enforcing 'rights to access reproductive health care,' a term frequently associated with suppression of freedom of conscience among health care workers.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Tanzanian_bill_proposes_to_enforce_access_to_reproductive_health_services</link>
	<category>Tanzania-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Tanzanian_bill_proposes_to_enforce_access_to_reproductive_health_services</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US Catholic bishops urge support for freedom of conscience and religion in US</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; Daniel Cardinal DiNardo, speaking to a pro-life rally on behalf of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops Committee on Pro-Life Activities, challenged the decision of the Obama administration to force all employers to pay for contraceptives and embryodical drugs and services.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:37:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#US_Catholic_bishops_urge_support_for_freedom_of_conscience_and_religion_in_US</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#US_Catholic_bishops_urge_support_for_freedom_of_conscience_and_religion_in_US</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Social values &amp; medical expertise no longer compatible with childbearing&gt;</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; Anna Smajdor, an ethicist in the United Kingom, is defending the proposition that artificial wombs should be developed so that women no longer have to bear children. The most recent article continues a discussion begun in 2007, when she asserted that only by this means is it possible to remedy "the natural or physical injustices involved in the unequal gender roles of reproduction" and the alleged "social injustices that arise from them."</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jan 2012 20:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Social_values_and_medical_expertise_no_longer_compatible_with_childbearing</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Social_values_and_medical_expertise_no_longer_compatible_with_childbearing</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>J'ACCUSE! Why Obama is wrong on the HHS conscience regulations</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | President Barack Obama lost my vote yesterday when he declined to expand the exceedingly narrow conscience exemptions proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services. The issue of conscience protections is so foundational, I do not see how I ever could, in good conscience, vote for this man again.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Jan 2012 16:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#JACCUSE!_Why_Obama_is_wrong_on_the_HHS_conscience_regulations</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#JACCUSE!_Why_Obama_is_wrong_on_the_HHS_conscience_regulations</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>American Evangelicals: "new rules trample most cherished freedoms"</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) has expressed deep disappointment with plans by the Obama administration to force employers to pay for contraceptives and embryocides despite moral objections.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Jan 2012 17:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#American_Evangelicals:_new_rules__trample_._._._most_cherished_freedoms</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#American_Evangelicals:_new_rules__trample_._._._most_cherished_freedoms</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>'Expert' panel on abortion generates controversy in Ireland</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; A panel of 13 'experts' chaired by Mr. Justice Seán Ryan of the High Court of Ireland is to study a European Court of Human Rights ruling on abortion and advise the government what should be done in response.&amp;nbsp; Four members of the panel - Mary O'Toole, Dr Peter Boylan, Dr. Deirdre Madden, and Ailish Ní Riain - have been identified by anti-abortion groups in the country as having previously indicated that they favour legalizing abortion or reducing restrictions on it.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Jan 2012 17:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Expert_panel_on_abortion_generates_controversy_in_Ireland</link>
	<category>Ireland-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Expert_panel_on_abortion_generates_controversy_in_Ireland</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Evangelicals disappointed with White House decision on conscience protection</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) is deeply disappointed by a White House decision, announced today, that employers with religious objections to contraception will be forced to pay for services and procedures they believe are morally wrong.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Jan 2012 17:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Evangelicals_Disappointed_with_White_House_Decision_on_Conscience_Protection_</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2012.html#Evangelicals_Disappointed_with_White_House_Decision_on_Conscience_Protection_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US Catholic bishops vow to fight government edict</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; Responding to news that the Obama administration will continue plans to force all employers to pay for contraceptives and embryodical drugs and services, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has characterized the decision as an unprecedented attack on religious liberty. The Conference promises to continue working to reform the law.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Jan 2012 17:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#US_Catholic_bishops_vow_to_fight_government_edict</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#US_Catholic_bishops_vow_to_fight_government_edict</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Obama administration puts an expiration date on freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | Today the Obama Administration added insult to injury, announcing that it would give some religious nonprofits an additional year to &amp;ldquo;adapt” to its coercive mandate that nearly all insurance plans provide coverage for the abortion-inducing drug ella.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Jan 2012 17:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#Obama_Administration_Puts_an_Expiration_Date_on_Freedom_of_Conscience</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2012-01.html#Obama_Administration_Puts_an_Expiration_Date_on_Freedom_of_Conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Obama administration confirms plan to suppress freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; The US Department of Health and Human Services has confirmed that, as of 1 August, 2012, it will force employers to pay for contraceptives and embryodical drugs and services even if they object to doing so for reasons of conscience. However, the rule will not be applied to non-profit institutions until August, 2013.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Jan 2012 17:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Obama_administration_confirms_plan_to_suppress_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Obama_administration_confirms_plan_to_suppress_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Pope warns of attempts to limit freedom of religion in USA</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | Addressing American bishops at the Vatican, Pope Benedict XVI warned of "grave threats to the Church’s public moral witness presented by a radical secularism." He voiced special concern about "certain attempts" to limit freedom of religion.</description>
	<pubDate>19 Jan 2012 17:57:08 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Pope_warns_of_attempts_to_limit_freedom_of_religion_in_USA</link>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Pope_warns_of_attempts_to_limit_freedom_of_religion_in_USA</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>South Carolina Senate takes up protection of conscience bill</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; The Freedom of Conscience Act, a bill that passed the South Carolina House of Representatives last year, is to be considered by the state senate. It is a procedure-specific statute that focuses on embryonic and foetal research and acts that cause the death of an individual.</description>
	<pubDate>18 Jan 2012 17:56:08 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#South_Carolina_Senate_takes_up_protection_of_conscience_bill</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#South_Carolina_Senate_takes_up_protection_of_conscience_bill</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill introduced in Missouri</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Missouri Senate Bill 657 is drafted to prevent health care workers or institutions from being compelled to participate in any service or procedure to which they object for reasons of conscience. It is intended to protect them against criminal, civil and administrative proceedings, and from discrimination for the exercise of their convictions</description>
	<pubDate>17 Jan 2012 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_Missouri</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_Missouri</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Midwives in Scotland go to court over forced facilitation of abortion</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Scotland's largest health board, the National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, ordered two Catholic midwives to schedule and supervise other health care workers providing abortion. The organization rejected a grievance from the midwives, claiming that the protection of conscience provision in the Abortion Act exempts objectors only from active and direct participation in an abortion.</description>
	<pubDate>17 Jan 2012 17:53:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Midwives_in_Scotland_go_to_court_over_forced_facilitation_of_abortion</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Midwives_in_Scotland_go_to_court_over_forced_facilitation_of_abortion</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>British government asserts that legalization of assisted suicide must be decided by Parliament</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; In response to a question about the recommendation of a private commission chaired by Lord Falconer, the British Secretary of State for Justice has stated that assisted suicide should not be legalized by policy, but by a decision of Parliament enacted in legislation.</description>
	<pubDate>16 Jan 2012 17:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#British_government_asserts_that_legalization_of_assisted_suicide_</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#British_government_asserts_that_legalization_of_assisted_suicide_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Controversy over sex selective abortions in Canada</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; The Canadian Medical Association Journal has reported that sex selective abortion is being practised in Canada despite opposition from the public and from professional associations and regulators.</description>
	<pubDate>16 Jan 2012 17:51:21 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Controversy_over_sex_selective_abortions_in_Canada</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Controversy_over_sex_selective_abortions_in_Canada</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Population control and abortion in Pakistan</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Sindh, the second largest province in Pakistan, is setting up a Population Council for the purpose of implementing a population control programme. Among the concerns voiced by supporters of the plan is that most people are reluctant to adopt contraception, and that many medical professionals object to abortion for religious reasons.</description>
	<pubDate>16 Jan 2012 17:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Population_control_and_abortion_in_Pakistan</link>
	<category>Pakistan-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Population_control_and_abortion_in_Pakistan</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Massachusetts Initiative Petition re: Assisted Suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt; | The following protection of conscience provisions are included in a bill to legalize assisted suicide in Massachusetts. Although Section 1 of the bill states that participation in the procedure must be "entirely voluntary," participation is defined in Section 3(d)ii to exclude referral. Thus, the bill would, if enacted, support compulsory referral for assisted suicide. Section 3(d)ii D of the bill would also require objecting institutions not only to permit referral under Section 3(d)ii, but would require them to permit physicians in their facilities to contract for off-premises provision of assisted suicide.</description>
	<pubDate>13 Jan 2012 18:41:29 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/masschusetts01.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/masschusetts01.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Florida State Senate Bill 598 (2012) An act relating to contraception</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Law&lt;/strong&gt; | Text of Florida State Senate Bill 598 - protection of conscience provisions</description>
	<pubDate>13 Jan 2012 18:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/florida01.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/florida01.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience and modern (ie, democratic) totalitarianism</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Rev. Robert John Araujo, S.J.&lt;/strong&gt; | My objective here is to examine the exercise of conscience and religious liberty in a particular light removed from the drama and heroism of peaceful civil disobedience. My effort is designed to look at the nature of properly formed conscience and the corresponding exercise of religious freedom and what it may mean in the context of the United States and other western democracies today.</description>
	<pubDate>13 Jan 2012 18:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical131.html</link>
	<category>Ethical Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical131.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Warning that protection of conscience laws may enable euthanasia</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; Burke J. Balch, J.D., director of National Right to Life Committee's Robert Powell Center for Medical Ethics in the USA, has warned that protection of conscience laws like the Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act and Mississippi's Health Care Rights of Conscience Act are dangerous because they may permit health care workers to commit euthanasia by withdrawing or refusing to provide medical treatment for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>12 Jan 2012 17:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Warning_that_protection_of_conscience_laws_may_enable_euthanasia</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Warning_that_protection_of_conscience_laws_may_enable_euthanasia</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Assisted suicide to be debated in British House of Commons</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; The Commons Backbench Business Committee has decided that the House of Commons in the United Kingdom will debate the assisted suicide guidelines published by the Director of Public Prosecutions in 2010.  The guidelines had the effect of leaving the regulation of assisted suicide in the hands of police and Crown Counsel, though the practice remained a criminal offence.</description>
	<pubDate>12 Jan 2012 17:47:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Assisted_suicide_to_be_debated_in_British_House_of_Commons</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Assisted_suicide_to_be_debated_in_British_House_of_Commons</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Misconduct in scientific research acknowledged in United Kingdom</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A survey published in the British Medical Journal found that more than 10% of British scientists or physicians have witnessed intentional fabrication of data during research, and 6% were aware that research misconduct had not been properly investigated.</description>
	<pubDate>12 Jan 2012 17:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Misconduct_in_scientific_research_acknowledged_in_United_Kingdom</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Misconduct_in_scientific_research_acknowledged_in_United_Kingdom</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Mixed message from US government for victims of unethical medical research</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp; From 1946 to 1948, American and Guatemalan physicians infected prostitutes and prisoners with syphilis without their knowledge or consent in order to test penicillin. The research was discovered by a Wellesley College professor in 2009, and lawyers for the victims filed a class-action lawsuit against the United States.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Jan 2012 17:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Mixed_message_from_US_government_for_victims_of_unethical_medical_research</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#Mixed_message_from_US_government_for_victims_of_unethical_medical_research</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>British member of European Parliament favours assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Member of the Euopean Parliament Roger Helmer has written in favour of assisted suicide on grounds beyond those recommended by a recent report by a private commission, advocating the availability of the procedure for those not terminally ill.</description>
	<pubDate>9 Jan 2012 17:42:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#British_member_of_European_Parliament_favours_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#British_member_of_European_Parliament_favours_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>American College of Physicians acknowledges freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The American College of Physicians has acknowledged that physicians who object to "abortion, sterilization, contraception or other reproductive services . . . is not obligated to recommend, perform or prescribe them." The statement is in the most recent edition of the College's Ethics Manual.</description>
	<pubDate>8 Jan 2012 21:42:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#American_College_of_Physicians_acknowledges_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#American_College_of_Physicians_acknowledges_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>United Kingdom report recommends compulsory referral for assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A report produced by a privately established and funded Commission on Assisted Dying has recommended that assisted suicide be legalized in the United Kingdom for any competent person over 18 years old who is terminally ill and expected to live less than 12 months. It also recommends that physicians who refuse to assist with suicide for reasons of conscience be compelled to refer patients to colleagues who will do so</description>
	<pubDate>4 Jan 2012 21:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#United_Kingdom_report_recommends_compulsory_referral_for_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2012-01.html#United_Kingdom_report_recommends_compulsory_referral_for_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Abortion and Prince Edward Island</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Sean Murphy&lt;/strong&gt; | The attempt to characterize the exercise of freedom of conscience by physicians as 'professional misconduct' may surprise Islanders who remember the promises made when abortion was legalized in Canada over forty years ago.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Jan 2012 17:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/abortion/abortion34.html</link>
	<category>Background</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/abortion/abortion34.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Continued vigilance urged in New Jersey</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Congressman Chris Smith, who supported objecting nurses against the hospital run by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey when it attempted to involve them in abortions, states that the hospital should adopt transparent policies to ensure that freedom of conscience will continue to be respected in the institution.</description>
	<pubDate>28 Dec 2011 21:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Continued_vigiligance_urged_in_New_Jersey</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Continued_vigiligance_urged_in_New_Jersey</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Hospital reaches agreement with objecting nurses</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey has agreed not to replace objecting nurses who have filed suit against the University Hospital, or reduce their hours. The nurses have agreed to protect patients in an emergency until someone else can attend to assist.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Dec 2011 21:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Hospital_reaches_agreement_with_objecting_nurses</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Hospital_reaches_agreement_with_objecting_nurses</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Victory for pro-life nurses in lawsuit against NJ hospital</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Alliance Defence Fund&lt;/strong&gt; | As a result of a federal court hearing Thursday, a New Jersey hospital has agreed that it will not force nurses to assist with abortion cases. Alliance Defense Fund attorneys represent 12 nurses who filed suit against the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey after the hospital sought to require the nurses to help with abortion cases in violation of federal and state law.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Dec 2011 17:37:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Victory_for_pro-life_nurses_in_lawsuit_against_NJ_hospital</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Victory_for_pro-life_nurses_in_lawsuit_against_NJ_hospital</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Colorado Christian university first Evangelical university to fight abortificaient mandate</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Becket Fund for Religious Liberty&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Colorado Christian University (CCU) today became the first interdenominational Christian college to challenge in federal court a new &amp;ldquo;Affordable Care Act” (aka &amp;ldquo;Obamacare”) mandate for abortifacients (drugs which induce abortions). Colorado Christian joins the monks at Belmont Abbey College pushing back against government intrusion into personal religious convictions that is unprecedented in the health care realm.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Dec 2011 17:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Colorado_Christian_University_First_Evangelical_University_to_Fight_Abortifacient_Mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Colorado_Christian_University_First_Evangelical_University_to_Fight_Abortifacient_Mandate</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Letter to President Obama from 60 non-Catholic organizations</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | Mr. President, religious organizations beyond the Catholic community have deep moral objections to a requirement that their health insurance plans must cover abortifacients. Religious organizations beyond the Catholic community object to the current narrow exemption which puts them outside the definition of &amp;ldquo;religious employers.” And religious organizations beyond the Catholic community object to any revision of the exemption that would limit it to churches and denominationally affiliated organizations.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Dec 2011 19:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065comment17.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065comment17.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience exemptions and the press</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt; | Several Catholic institutions have made it clear that if the conscience exemption is not broadened, they will stop offering health insurance to their employees or, if a college to their students, rather than bow to the pressure to subsidize insurance coverage for procedures they fund morally objectionable.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Dec 2011 17:40:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Exemptions_&amp;_the_Press</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Exemptions_&amp;_the_Press</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Evangelical college sues US federal government for violating freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Colorado Christian University (CCU) has begun a civil suit against the US federal government for suppression of religious freedom and freedom of conscience. While the university does not object to paying for contraception, it does object to paying for drugs or devices that could have embryocidal or abortifacient effects, even if they are described as contraceptives.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Dec 2011 21:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Evangelical_college_sues_US_federal_government_for_violating_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Evangelical_college_sues_US_federal_government_for_violating_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>60 non-Catholic groups write President to defend freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Representatives of 60 non-Catholic groups have sent a letter to President Barak Obama expressing their solidarity with Catholics and Catholic institutions and their own objections to the Obama administration's plans to force employers to pay for contraceptives, embryocides and abortifacients, even if they object to such drugs or services for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Dec 2011 21:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#60_non-Catholic_groups_write_President_to_defend_of_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#60_non-Catholic_groups_write_President_to_defend_of_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience clauses needed worldwide for medical professionals</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Rebecca Taylor&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; The moral conscience of health care providers is under attack. Increasingly they are being forced to provide medical services that go against their moral beliefs</description>
	<pubDate>17 Dec 2011 19:41:42 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Clauses_Needed_Worldwide_for_Medical_Professionals</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Clauses_Needed_Worldwide_for_Medical_Professionals</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>British General Medical Council drawing up guidelines for assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Britain's General Medical Council (GMC) is considering how it should deal with physicians who are accused of assisting people to commit suicide, but who are not prosecuted.&amp;nbsp;. . .&amp;nbsp;In effect, police and prosecutors have become regulators of the practice. If they decide not to prosecute a physician who has assisted a suicide, the GMC is left with the problem of what, if anything, should be done by way of discipline. In addition, some kinds of more indirect assistance that would not support prosecution might give rise to complaints of professional misconduct.</description>
	<pubDate>15 Dec 2011 21:35:21 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#British_General_Medical_Council_drawing_up_guidelines_for_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#British_General_Medical_Council_drawing_up_guidelines_for_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Abortion ideology trumps aid for victims of human trafficking</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Society/Politics&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Jonathon Imbody&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; The decision to insist on submission to its abortion ideology as a condition for federal grants illustrates the depth of the administration’s radical abortion policy and its increasingly obvious disdain for conscience rights and religious freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>7 Dec 2011 18:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical09.html</link>
	<category>USA-Society/Politics</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical09.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Assisted suicide initiative in conflict with physicians in Massachusetts</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | An initiative supporting an assisted suicide bill has secured enough signatures to bring the bill to a ballot in 2012. Although the bill states that participation in the procedure must be "entirely voluntary," participation is defined to exclude referral. Thus, the bill would, if enacted, support compulsory referral by physicians for assisted suicide, something that would be incompatible with the position of the Massachusetts Medical Society. It would also require objecting institutions not only to permit referral, but would require them to permit physicians in their facilities to contract for off-premises provision of assisted suicide.</description>
	<pubDate>7 Dec 2011 21:33:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Assisted_suicide_initiative_in_conflict_with_physicians_in_Massachusetts</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Assisted_suicide_initiative_in_conflict_with_physicians_in_Massachusetts</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Planned Parenthood opposes freedom of conscience in Florida</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A bill in the Florida State Senate that will ensure that insurance plans covering contraceptives will not impose long waiting periods or steep co-payments on employees. Nancy Detert's Bill 598 includes a protection of conscience provision provision to ensure that religious employers are not forced to cover contraceptives that are contrary to their religious convictions. However, Planned Parenthood is protesting the exemption, demanding that employers be forced to pay for procedures or services they believe to be wrong.</description>
	<pubDate>4 Dec 2011 21:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Planned_Parenthood_opposes_freedom_of_conscience_in_Florida</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Planned_Parenthood_opposes_freedom_of_conscience_in_Florida</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience v. Conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;Marc O. DeGirolami&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/authors.htm#Marc_O._DeGirolami_"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp;The right question is not whether the religious institution’s conscience should &amp;ldquo;trump” the individual’s conscience. If the health care law contains an exemption for religious employers, the individual woman is not being prevented from obtaining contraceptive services. She is only losing the power to compel her religious employer (for whom, one should expect, she agreed to work voluntarily) to pay for her contraceptive services.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Dec 2011 19:43:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065comment18.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065comment18.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Hospital hires additional staff to cover for objecting nurses</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey will hire additional staff to perform work related to abortions that 12 of 16 nurses working at the Same Day Surgery Unit at the University Hospital refuse to perform for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Dec 2011 21:31:36 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Hospital_hires_additional_staff_to_cover_for_objecting_nurses</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Hospital_hires_additional_staff_to_cover_for_objecting_nurses</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Catholic pride and conscience exemptions</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt; | Polls may indicate that many Catholics do not agree with the teaching of their bishops about contraception, but those same Catholics will not take kindly to any efforts to tell them how to run their schools, hospitals and social service agencies.</description>
	<pubDate>1 Dec 2011 17:41:47 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Catholic_Pride_&amp;_Conscience_Exemptions</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Catholic_Pride_&amp;_Conscience_Exemptions</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Physicians in United Kingdom warned against facilitating assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Medical Defence Union in the United Kingdom, the organization that defends physicians accused of malpractice or unethical conduct, has warned its members that they could be prosecuted if they provide medical records to a patient when they have reason to believe that the records will be used to access assisted suicide.</description>
	<pubDate>30 Nov 2011 21:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Physicians_in_United_Kingdom_warned_against_facilitating_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Physicians_in_United_Kingdom_warned_against_facilitating_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience rights, nurses and abortion</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt; | . . .there are circumstances in which the issue of religious liberty can be invoked in ways that cloud the issue or, worse from my point of view, misunderstand what religion calls us to do. The facts of a case matter.</description>
	<pubDate>29 Nov 2011 17:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Rights,_Nurses_&amp;_Abortion</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Rights,_Nurses_&amp;_Abortion</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Indonesia considers population control law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The government of Indonesia is considering the possibility of imposing legal limits to population growth. It is thought that local governments would become more active in population control if such legislation were passed. Government enforced regulations restricting births would have a significant impact on health care professionals who object to some forms of birth control or abortion.</description>
	<pubDate>29 Nov 2011 21:22:10 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Indonesia_considers_population_control_law</link>
	<category>Indonesia-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Indonesia_considers_population_control_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Freedom of conscience for pharmacists on trial in Washington</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A trial begins today in Washington State in the case of Stormans v. Selecky. The plaintiffs include a family-owned pharmacy and two individual pharmacists, who have religious objections to dispensing Plan B and ella. Their religious beliefs forbid them from dispensing these drugs because they can operate as embryocides. A Washington State regulation demands that they dispense the drugs despite their objections.</description>
	<pubDate>28 Nov 2011 21:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Freedom_of_conscience_for_pharmacists_on_trial_in_Washington_</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Freedom_of_conscience_for_pharmacists_on_trial_in_Washington_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience, MSNBC &amp; Commonweal</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Is it really an assault on others' rights to permit Catholic colleges, or hospitals, or social service agencies, to be distinctly Catholic? It is almost comic to see liberals championing the Dalai Lama, whose cause is a theocratic one, however humane it may be, while demeaning the Catholic hierarchy as a threat to liberalism. Is it the saffron robes?</description>
	<pubDate>18 Nov 2011 17:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience,_MSNBC_&amp;_Commonweal</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience,_MSNBC_&amp;_Commonweal</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Group encourages complaints against objecting physicians</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The P.E.I. Reproductive Rights Organization (PEIRRO) was formed to lobby for easier access to abortion. Proposals least likely to impact freedom of conscience for health care workers involve dropping the requirement for physician referrals, paying for abortions done in clinics and paying the associated travel costs. However, PEIRRO also encourages people to make complaints of professional misconduct against physicians who decline to refer for abortion for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>24 Nov 2011 21:19:47 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Group_encourages_complaints_against_objecting_physicians</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Group_encourages_complaints_against_objecting_physicians</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Royal Society of Canada recommends legalization of assisted suicide, euthanasia and compulsory referral</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Royal Society of Canada, which describes itself as "a national organization of distinguished scholars, artists and scientists," has published a report advocating legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia. The report also recommends that objecting health care professionals be forced to facilitate the services by referral.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Nov 2011 21:18:21 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Royal_Society_of_Canada_recommends_legalization_of_assisted_suicide,_euthanasia,_and_compulsory_referral</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Royal_Society_of_Canada_recommends_legalization_of_assisted_suicide,_euthanasia,_and_compulsory_referral</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>New Jersey hospital files brief opposing injunction supporting objectors</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey has filed a brief opposing an injunction being sought to protect nurses who object to participating in abortions. The brief claims that nurses have not been made to assist with the procedures, nor will they be asked to do so, but have only been asked to provide pre-operative and post-operative care that some of them have provided in the past without objection.</description>
	<pubDate>22 Nov 2011 21:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Jersey_Hospital_files_brief_opposing_injunction_supporting_objectors</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Jersey_Hospital_files_brief_opposing_injunction_supporting_objectors</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Obama's choice</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt; Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; I do not believe the President is hostile to religion, but if he fails to expand the conscience exemption, I could not make the case with a straight face.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Nov 2011 17:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Obamas_Choice</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Obamas_Choice</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Attempt to discuss accommodation of objecting nurses rejected</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Lawyers representing 12 nurses who object to abortion have returned to court alleging that the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey is attempting to impose adverse changes in their employment or assignments. The new complaint arises from a letter to the nurses asking them to attend meetings to discuss accommodation of their concerns.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Nov 2011 21:15:46 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Attempt_to_discuss_accommodation_of_objecting_nurses_rejected</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Attempt_to_discuss_accommodation_of_objecting_nurses_rejected</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>New Zealand Medical Council accepts ruling on freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The New Zealand Medical Council has withdrawn its appeal of the judgment of Justice MacKenzie given in the High Court in Wellington in December 2010. The judgment held that a medical practitioner who objected to abortion for reasons of conscience was not obliged to refer for the procedure.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Nov 2011 21:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Zealand_Medical_Council_accepts_ruling_on_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>New Zealand-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Zealand_Medical_Council_accepts_ruling_on_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>NJ hospital threatens employment discrimination against pro-life nurses despite court order</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Alliance Defence Fund&lt;/strong&gt; | Alliance Defense Fund attorneys representing 12 pro-life nurses filed a motion for an emergency court order Friday against the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. In violation of an existing court order, UMDNJ is attempting to force the nurses into meetings that would impose discriminatory job &amp;ldquo;transfer” and other &amp;ldquo;changes” to their employment solely because of their objections to helping with abortions.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Nov 2011 17:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#NJ_hospital_threatens_employment_discrimination</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#NJ_hospital_threatens_employment_discrimination</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>A victory for conscience and a culture of life</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Right to Life New Zealand&lt;/strong&gt; | Right to Life welcomes the decision of the New Zealand Medical Council not to proceed with its appeal to the Court of Appeal of the judgment of Justice MacKenzie given in the High Court in Wellington in December 2010. The judgment stated that a medical practioner who was opposed in conscience to abortions was not obliged to refer a woman seeking an abortion to another doctor who would facilitate the abortion.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Nov 2011 17:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#A_Victory_for_Conscience_and_a_Culture_of_Life</link>
	<category>New Zealand-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#A_Victory_for_Conscience_and_a_Culture_of_Life</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Most US obstetrician/gynaecologists reject ACOG definition of pregnancy</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A survey of 1800 American obstetrician/gynaelecologists with a response rate of 66% found that over half of the respondents believe that pregnancy begins at conception rather than implantation. The finding is significant because it demonstrates that a significant number of practitioners reject redefinions of pregnancy proposed by groups like the by institutions like the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG).</description>
	<pubDate>18 Nov 2011 21:13:23 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Most_US_obstetrician/gynaecologists_reject_ACOG_definition_of_pregnancy</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Most_US_obstetrician/gynaecologists_reject_ACOG_definition_of_pregnancy</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US politician dismisses "this conscience thing"</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Nancy Pelosi, Minority Leader (Democratic Party) in the US House of Representatives, told a Washington Post Reporter that she opposes freedom of conscience for health care workers opposed to abortion because they would allow women to "die on the floor." She complained that abortion opponents "have this conscience thing."</description>
	<pubDate>17 Nov 2011 21:12:06 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_politician_dismisses_this_conscience_thing_</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_politician_dismisses_this_conscience_thing_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Opposition to Philippines Reproductive Health bill preventing passage</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Philippines House Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales II states that the controversial Reproductive Health Bill is unlikely to come to a vote before 2012 because, for the time being, there are enough members of congress opposed to it to prevent its passage.</description>
	<pubDate>16 Nov 2011 21:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Opposition_to_Philippines_Reproductive_Health_bill_preventing_passage</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Opposition_to_Philippines_Reproductive_Health_bill_preventing_passage</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Most physicians in British Columbia not supportive of assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Dr. Douglas McGregor, regional director of palliative care for the Vancouver Coast Health Authority, has testified that physicians value and esteem life &amp;ldquo;above everything else.” Identifying that as his own conviction, he stated that he did not think that many of his colleagues would take a different view.</description>
	<pubDate>14 Nov 2011 21:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Most_physicians_in_British_Columbia_not_supportive_of_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Most_physicians_in_British_Columbia_not_supportive_of_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>"Nurses of conscience" say NO to abortion coercion at UMDNJ</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Rep. Chris Smith&lt;/strong&gt; | It is an honor and privilege to join these courageous &amp;ldquo;nurses of conscience” who at great risk of being fired, demoted or otherwise retaliated against, have asserted their fundamental civil rights guaranteed by both federal and state law by saying &amp;ldquo;no” to coerced participation in the killing of unborn children at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ).</description>
	<pubDate>14 Nov 2011 17:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Nurses_of_Conscience_say_no_to_abortion_coercion_at_UMDNJ</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Nurses_of_Conscience_say_no_to_abortion_coercion_at_UMDNJ</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US congressman supports objecting New Jersey nurses</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Appearing at a news conference in front of the hospital run by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Representative Chris Smith described the hospital's policy on abortion as "coercive," "highly unethical" and "blatantly illegal."</description>
	<pubDate>14 Nov 2011 21:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Congressman_supports_objecting_New_Jersey_nurses</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Congressman_supports_objecting_New_Jersey_nurses</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Australian physicians form lobby group for euthanasia</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Doctors for Voluntary Euthanasia Choice has been formed in Australia by physicians supporting legalization of the procedure. The group plans to make submissions to the parliaments of South Australia and Tasmania.</description>
	<pubDate>13 Nov 2011 21:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Australian_physicians_form_lobby_group_for_euthanasia</link>
	<category>Australia-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Australian_physicians_form_lobby_group_for_euthanasia</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Complaints against exercise of freedom of conscience by pharmacist in UK</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A pharmacist at a Boots Pharmacy in Middleton Grange Shopping Centre, Hartlepool, England, has been criticized for refusing to dispense the morning after pill for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>12 Nov 2011 21:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Complaints_against_exercise_of_freedom_of_conscience_by_pharmacist_in_UK</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Complaints_against_exercise_of_freedom_of_conscience_by_pharmacist_in_UK</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>New Jersey hospital accused of lying</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A lawyer for the Alliance Defence Fund (ADF) has accused the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey of lying about the abortion policy at the University Hospital. Responding to an e-mail from a lawyer representing the University, Matt Bowman states that the ADF went to court to prevent two of the objecting nurses from being forced to assist with abortions, which seems to refer to assignments to pre-operative and post-operative care.</description>
	<pubDate>11 Nov 2011 21:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Jersey_hospital_accused_of_lying</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Jersey_hospital_accused_of_lying</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Belmont Abbey sues US federal government for attack on freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Assisted by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Belmont Abbey, a small Catholic liberal arts college in North Carolina, has filed a civil suit against the US government because of a regulation that would force it to pay for contraceptives, embryocides and abortifacients for students or terminate all health insurance plans for employees or students.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Nov 2011 21:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Belmont_Abbey_sues_US_federal_government_for_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Belmont_Abbey_sues_US_federal_government_for_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Bemont Abbey College sues the federal government over new Obamacare mandate</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty&lt;/strong&gt; | Today, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed a lawsuit against the federal government on behalf of Belmont Abbey College over the &amp;ldquo;Affordable Care Act” (aka &amp;ldquo;Obamacare”), that forces the College to violate its deeply-held religious beliefs or pay a severe fine. The heart of the lawsuit involves the recently issued Health and Human Services’ mandate that requires thousands of religious organizations to provide, against their conscience, contraceptives they consider to be abortifacients—namely Plan B and Ella—and sterilization.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Nov 2011 16:02:44 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Belmont_Abbey_College_sues_the_federal_government_</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Belmont_Abbey_College_sues_the_federal_government_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Widespread neglect of elderly alleged in hospitals in United Kindom</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Patients Association in the United Kingdom has issued what the Daily Mail calls "a damning report . . .that has revealed a catalogue of abuse" in British state hospitals. As a result of pressure from the Daily Mail and the Patients Association, the Care Quality Commission conducted hospital inspections and found that "in a fifth of them the care was so bad they were breaking the law."</description>
	<pubDate>9 Nov 2011 20:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Widespread_neglect_of_elderly_alleged_at_hospitals_in_United_Kingdom</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Widespread_neglect_of_elderly_alleged_at_hospitals_in_United_Kingdom</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>IVF mother admits error in having child at 57</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A woman who used in vitro fertilization to achieve a pregnancy at age 57 now concedes that her critics were right in asserting that she was too old to have a child. Her relationship with the father of the child ended because of the "shock" of having a baby.</description>
	<pubDate>7 Nov 2011 20:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#IVF_mother_admits_error_in_having_child_at_57</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#IVF_mother_admits_error_in_having_child_at_57</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Threats to freedom of conscience could have far-reaching consequences</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Society/Politics&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;David Crockett&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; . . . alas, the assault on conscience has begun, led by various forces in government, academia and pressure groups. The most common threats come in the areas of health care, religious integrity and nondiscrimination policies.</description>
	<pubDate>4 Nov 2011 19:55:57 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical10.html#Threats_to_freedom_of_conscience_could_have_far-reaching_consequences</link>
	<category>USA-Society/Politics</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical10.html#Threats_to_freedom_of_conscience_could_have_far-reaching_consequences</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Religious liberty: the culture and the Church</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | The current debate on religious liberty has arisen in the specific context of a discussion about conscience rights, and there is a danger here to our cultural understandings. Fellow leftie Catholics, please take note. The rights of conscience in the civic sphere do not correspond to any rights to conscience within the Church.</description>
	<pubDate>4 Nov 2011 17:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Religious_Liberty:_The_Culture_&amp;_the_Church</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Religious_Liberty:_The_Culture_&amp;_the_Church</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Judges issues temporary injunction to protect objecting nurses</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order that prohibits a hospital run by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey from forcing any of 12 objecting nurses who have sued the facility to participate in training or services related to abortions.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Nov 2011 20:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Judge_issues_temporary_injunction_to_protect_objecting_nurses</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Judge_issues_temporary_injunction_to_protect_objecting_nurses</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Court temporarily stops NJ hospital from forcing nurses to participate in abortions</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Alliance Defence Fund&lt;/strong&gt; | A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday that prohibits a New Jersey hospital from forcing any of 12 nurses that sued the facility to participate in training or services related to abortions. The order, which the hospital agreed to, is in effect until the court decides whether to issue any additional order at a Nov. 18 hearing.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Nov 2011 17:25:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Court_temporarily_stops_NJ_hospital_</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Court_temporarily_stops_NJ_hospital_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Ontario experts seek mandatory abortion training, referral</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Ministry of Health and Long Term Care in Ontario has fully funded and published a report from an "expert panel" recommending mandatory abortion training for medical and nursing students, and mandatory referral and facilitation of abortion by all medical practitioners, including those who object to the procedure.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Nov 2011 20:54:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Ontario_experts_seek_mandatory_abortion_training,_referral</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Ontario_experts_seek_mandatory_abortion_training,_referral</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Evidence taken at hearing of government attack on freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Sub-Committee on Health held a hearing on the subject, Do New Health Care Mandates Threaten Conscience Rights and Access to Care? In his opening remarks, the Chairman of the committee, Joseph R. Pitts, commented that "we should universally support the notion that the federal government should be prohibited from taking coercive actions to force people to abandon their religious principles."</description>
	<pubDate>2 Nov 2011 20:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Evidence_taken_at_hearing_of_government_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience_</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Evidence_taken_at_hearing_of_government_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Sub-Committee on Health</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Do New Health Care Mandates Threaten Conscience Rights and Access to Care?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Jane G. Belford&lt;/strong&gt; | Our Catholic schools, hospitals, clinics, and social service programs serve tens of thousands of non-Catholics. No one is required to become Catholic in order to receive these services. Yet this mandate would require us to violate our religious beliefs to serve them.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Nov 2011 16:22:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal071.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal071.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Sub-Committee on Health</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Do New Health Care Mandates Threaten Conscience Rights and Access to Care?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;David L. Stevens, MD&lt;/strong&gt; | The potential "religious exemption" in the contraception mandate--exempting only a nano-sector of "religious employers" from the guidelines--is meaningless to conscientiously objecting health care professionals, insurers and patients.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Nov 2011 16:19:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal070.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal070.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Sub-Committee on Health</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Do New Health Care Mandates Threaten Conscience Rights and Access to Care?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; |&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;William J. Cox&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; A fundamental principle of religious freedom is the right of religious institutions to autonomy in their self-definition and governance. Simply stated, churches and religious institutions have the right to define and govern themselves free from government interference and entanglement. The HHS exemption violates this right by redefining Catholic institutional ministries in a manner that excludes central elements of their faith.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Nov 2011 16:09:14 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal069.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal069.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Sub-Committee on Health</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Do New Health Care Mandates Threaten Conscience Rights and Access to Care?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Hon. Joseph R. Pitts&lt;/strong&gt; | Groups who have for centuries cared for the sick and poor will now be forced to violate their religious beliefs if they want to continue to serve their communities. Whether one supports or opposes the health care law, we should universally support the notion that the federal government should be prohibited from taking coercive actions to force people to abandon their religious principles.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Nov 2011 16:06:36 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal068.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal068.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>HHS and religious liberty</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | If HHS intentionally discriminated against the Catholic Church in the awarding of grants, that violates the First Amendment. If, however, HHS set a requirement, and the Church feels it is unable to meet that requirement for its own moral reasons, I do not discern a religious liberty issue: Again, the Church does not have a &amp;ldquo;right” to a government contract. But, it is incumbent upon HHS officials to make it clear what motivated them and a series of congressional hearings on the matter would certainly help illuminate what is now hidden.</description>
	<pubDate>1 Nov 2011 17:47:12 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#HHS_and_Religious_Liberty</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#HHS_and_Religious_Liberty</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Cardinal calls for greater conscience protection in health care reform on eve of subcommittee hearing</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt; | Congress should strengthen conscience protections for health care providers and ensure that health care reform measures do not impede religious liberty, said the U.S. bishops’ chairman of Pro-Life Activities on the eve of a hearing by the House Subcommittee on Health, &amp;ldquo;Do New Health Law Mandates Threaten Conscience Rights and Access to Care?”</description>
	<pubDate>1 Nov 2011 16:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Cardinal_Calls_For_Greater_Conscience_Protection_In_Health_Care</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Cardinal_Calls_For_Greater_Conscience_Protection_In_Health_Care</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>12 nurses sue NJ hospital for forcing them to participate in abortions</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Alliance Defence Fund&lt;/strong&gt; | Twelve nurses represented by Alliance Defense Fund attorneys filed suit Monday against their employer, a hospital run by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, for requiring them to participate in abortions. Federal and state law both protect them from being forced to do so.</description>
	<pubDate>1 Nov 2011 17:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#2_nurses_sue_NJ_hospital_</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#2_nurses_sue_NJ_hospital_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US cardinal protests federal government attack on freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Writing to Joseph R. Pitts, Chairman of the US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Sub-Committee on Health, Daniel Cardinal DiNardo thanked him for scheduling a hearing into the effects of a new federal regulation. The Cardinal observed that the protection of conscience exemption in the regulation is wholly inadequate. &amp;ldquo;Jesus and the apostles would not be ‘religious enough’ under such a test, as they served and healed people of different religions,” he wrote.</description>
	<pubDate>1 Nov 2011 20:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Cardinal_protests_federal_government_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Cardinal_protests_federal_government_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Experts suggest organ harvesting without declaration of death</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Two experts have proposed that the practice of waiting until death has been pronounced before organs are harvested should be dropped, and that new standards should permit the removal of vital organs from living patients. Instead, they propose that guidelines should ensure that donors are "beyond suffering" and that their autonomy is respected.</description>
	<pubDate>27 Oct 2011 20:42:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Experts_suggest_organ_harvesting_without_declaration_of_death</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Experts_suggest_organ_harvesting_without_declaration_of_death</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Contraception and abortion services will be mandatory in state health system</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| The Secretary of State for the United Kingdom states that it is the British government plans to pass regulations that will required local health authorities to provide "appropriate access to contraception and abortion services."</description>
	<pubDate>27 Oct 2011 20:40:41 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Contraception_and_abortion_services_will_be_mandatory_in_state_health_system</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Contraception_and_abortion_services_will_be_mandatory_in_state_health_system</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Scots MP plans another attempt to legalize euthanasia</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Independent Lothians MSP Margo MacDonald is planning to introduce a new version of an assisted suicide bill that was rejected by the Scottish Parliament last year.[</description>
	<pubDate>26 Oct 2011 20:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Scots_MP_plans_another_attempt_to_legalize_euthanasia</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Scots_MP_plans_another_attempt_to_legalize_euthanasia</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Catholic bishop testifies before judiciary committee</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Chair of the USCCB’s Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty, Bishop Lori of Bridgeport, testified before the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee about the threats to freedom of conscience and religion posed by policies and regulations now being implemented by the US federal government.</description>
	<pubDate>26 Oct 2011 20:38:27 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Catholic_Bishop_testifies_before_Judiciary_Committee</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Catholic_Bishop_testifies_before_Judiciary_Committee</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Most Rev. C. Lori&lt;/strong&gt; | Religious liberty is also prior to the state itself. It is not merely a privilege that the government grants us and so may take away at will. Instead, religious liberty is inherent in our very humanity, hard-wired into each and every one of us by our Creator. Thus government has a perennial obligation to acknowledge and protect religious liberty as fundamental, no matter the moral and political trends of the moment.</description>
	<pubDate>26 Oct 2011 16:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal067.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal067.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Cooking up a healthy portion of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Donald DeMarco&lt;/strong&gt; | It is a commonplace misunderstanding of freedom that it is something negative and somehow becomes more itself to the degree that it is separated from knowledge. . . . Another common misconception is that conscience can operate alone, apart from objective truth. But conscience does not create truth, but discovers it.</description>
	<pubDate>22 Oct 2011 16:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical130.html</link>
	<category>Ethical Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical130.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>UN bureaucrat urges decriminalization of abortion as matter of right</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Special Rapporteur on Health Anand Grover has submitted a report to the UN General Assembly demanding the removal of all legal restrictions on abortion, claiming that access to abortion is required by human rights law. The Holy See reminded the General Assembly that no right to abortion exists in international law.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Oct 2011 20:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#UN_bureaucrat_urges_decriminalization_of_abortion_as_matter_of_right</link>
	<category>International-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#UN_bureaucrat_urges_decriminalization_of_abortion_as_matter_of_right</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US senator opposes Obama regulation, supports freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | American Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania has joined those supporting the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act of 2011, which would ensure freedom of conscience for religious health care providers whose beliefs conflict with demands to provide services arising from US health care reform.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Oct 2011 20:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Senator_opposes_Obama_regulation,_supports_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Senator_opposes_Obama_regulation,_supports_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>UK nurses warned not to discuss assisted suicide or euthanasia</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Royal College of Nursing plans to issue guidelines to remind nurses that it is illegal to offer information about assisted dying, including contact information for those willing to provide the procedure, in case the provision of information might be seen as ‘encouragement’.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Oct 2011 20:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#UK_nurses_warned_not_to_discuss_assisted_suicide_or_euthanasia</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#UK_nurses_warned_not_to_discuss_assisted_suicide_or_euthanasia</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Abortion committee upholds right of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Right to Life New Zealand&lt;/strong&gt; | Right to Life commends the Abortion Supervisory Committee for promoting protection for clinicians who refuse to perform or assist in abortions on the grounds of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>19 Oct 2011 16:25:57 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Abortion_committee_upholds_right_of_conscience_</link>
	<category>New Zealand-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Abortion_committee_upholds_right_of_conscience_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>New Zealand decision in favour of freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>A case in New Zealand indicates the importance of protection of conscience legislation.  A technician working for the Canterbury District Health Board was threatened with dismissal if she did not help to prepare instruments to be used for abortions.  She refused to do so for reasons of conscience and sought advice from Right to Life New Zealand, which brought the case to the attention of the Abortion Supervisory Committee.  As a result, the Committee wrote to all district health boards in the country to remind them of the protection of conscience provisions in New Zealand law.  The employer withdrew the threat of dismissal.</description>
	<pubDate>19 Oct 2011 20:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Zealand_decision_in_favour_of_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>New Zealand-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#New_Zealand_decision_in_favour_of_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Lesbian couple suppresses puberty in 11 year old son to facilitate sex change decision</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | An eleven year old boy in California is being given hormone blockers by his lesbian guardians to arrest puberty because they say that he wants to be a girl. Their plan is to continue delaying puberty until he is 14 or 15 and makes a decision about a sex change.</description>
	<pubDate>18 Oct 2011 20:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Lesbian_couple_suppress_puberty_in_11_year_old_son_to_facilitate_sex_change_decision</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Lesbian_couple_suppress_puberty_in_11_year_old_son_to_facilitate_sex_change_decision</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Obama administration cuts funding to Catholics for refusing contraception</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Obama administration has refused to continue funding an anti-human trafficking programme run by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops Migration and Refugee Services because the organization will not provide abortion, contraception or sterilizations.</description>
	<pubDate>17 Oct 2011 20:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Obama_administration_cuts_funding_to_Catholics_for_refusing_contraceptives</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Obama_administration_cuts_funding_to_Catholics_for_refusing_contraceptives</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Hospitals in UK use secret DNR orders to end patient lives</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A spot check of 100 National Health Service hospitals by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in the United Kingdom has found that in at least five hospitals, staff routinely completed do-not-resuscitate orders for elderly patients without notifying the patients or their families. Numerous cases of neglect were also documented</description>
	<pubDate>15 Oct 2011 20:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Hospitals_in_UK_use_secret_DNR_orders_to_end_patient_lives</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Hospitals_in_UK_use_secret_DNR_orders_to_end_patient_lives</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Bill passed in US House supports freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| The US House of Representatives has passed HR 358, a bill that includes protection of conscience measures and restricts the use of federal funds in paying for insurance coverage for abortion. President Obama will veto the bill if it passes Congress.</description>
	<pubDate>14 Oct 2011 20:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Bill_passed_in_US_House_supports_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Bill_passed_in_US_House_supports_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Philippines senate puts controversial bill on hold</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | The Reproductive Health Bill has stalled in the Philippines Senate because of the need to begin discussion of the national budget. Debate on the controversial bill is expected to resume in the new year.</description>
	<pubDate>13 Oct 2011 20:23:31 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Philippines_Senate_puts_controversial_bill_on_hold</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Philippines_Senate_puts_controversial_bill_on_hold</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>California Catholic Colleges oppose Obama adminstration demand to pay for contraceptives</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A number of Catholic Colleges in the San Francisco Bay area are protesting the federal regulation that would force them to pay for contraceptives. Saint Mary's College, the University of San Francisco and Santa Clara University were among those who sent letters to the Department of Health and Human Services.</description>
	<pubDate>13 Oct 2011 20:14:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#California_Catholic_Colleges_oppose_Obama_administration_demand_to_dispense_contraceptives</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#California_Catholic_Colleges_oppose_Obama_administration_demand_to_dispense_contraceptives</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>20 Catholic leaders protest attack on freedom of conscience by Obama administration</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | In a joint statement published in two Capitol Hill newspapers, the leaders of 20 national Catholic organizations have protested the &amp;ldquo;preventive services” regulation issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and called for legal protection of freedom of conscience in health care.</description>
	<pubDate>12 Oct 2011 20:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#20_Catholic_leaders_protest_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience_by_Obama_administration_</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#20_Catholic_leaders_protest_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience_by_Obama_administration_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Support access to health care?  Protect conscience rights</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Catholic Representatives&lt;/strong&gt; | We, the undersigned, strongly support access to life-affirming health care for all, and the ability of secular and religious groups and individuals to provide and receive such care. That is why we have raised objections to a rule issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services forcing almost all private health plans to cover sterilization procedures and contraceptive drugs, including drugs that may cause an early abortion.</description>
	<pubDate>11 Oct 2011 17:22:31 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Support_access_to_health_care__Protect_conscience_rights.</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Support_access_to_health_care__Protect_conscience_rights.</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US senators support freedom of conscience against Obama adminstration</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Nebraska Senators Mike Johanns and Utah Senator Orrin Hatch and 26 other US Senators have sent letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebellius concerning her department's intention to force employers to pay for morally controversial services despite conscientious objection.</description>
	<pubDate>6 Oct 2011 20:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Senators_support_freedom_of_conscience_against_Obama_administration</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Senators_support_freedom_of_conscience_against_Obama_administration</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>2012 presidential candidate supports freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Ron Paul, who is seeking nomination as a Republican candidate for the US Presidency in 2012, has announced that he supports those seeking "authentic opportunity" to refuse to provide services or procedures like abortion or contraception for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>6 Oct 2011 20:09:25 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#2012_presidential_candidate_supports_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#2012_presidential_candidate_supports_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Individual vs. institutional freedom of conscience at issue in US Supreme Court case</title>
	<description>The US Federal Government is contesting the view that there is a constitutional  "ministerial exemption" for churches that prevents the government from intervening in disputes between ecclesiastical ministers and their superiors.  Justices of the court commented that the position of the US Solicitor General was "extraordinary"</description>
	<pubDate>6 Oct 2011 20:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Individual_vs._institutional_freedom_of_conscience_at_issue_in_US_Supreme_Court_case</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#Individual_vs._institutional_freedom_of_conscience_at_issue_in_US_Supreme_Court_case</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Hatch, Johanns spearhead letter to HHS on women's preventive service mandates</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Senator Orrin Hatch&lt;/strong&gt; | U.S. Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Mike Johanns (R-Nebraska), and 26 of their Senate colleagues have written to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to press her on the constitutional concerns associated with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) implementation of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) recommendations for preventive health services mandates.</description>
	<pubDate>6 Oct 2011 16:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Hatch,_Johanns_Spearhead_Letter</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Hatch,_Johanns_Spearhead_Letter</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Ron Paul statement on new Obamacare\HHS regulation</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Ron Paul&lt;/strong&gt; | I am deeply troubled by the flippancy with which President Obama recently discussed regulations that are alarming and troublesome for many Americans. Not all Americans are comfortable with the Obama administration's decision to mandate coverage of birth control and morning-after pills, and the considerations of these people, many of them Christian conservatives, are worthy of careful consideration -- not mockery.</description>
	<pubDate>6 Oct 2011 16:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Ron_Paul_Statement_on_New_Obamacare/HHS_Regulation</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Ron_Paul_Statement_on_New_Obamacare/HHS_Regulation</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius from 28 US Senators</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Letter from US Senators&lt;/strong&gt; |. . . your adoption of IOM’s recommendations without amendment threatens the ability of many religious employers to continue to offer health coverage to their employees consistent with their beliefs.</description>
	<pubDate>5 Oct 2011 16:29:18 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065comment07.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065comment07.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US congressman protests attack on freedom of conscience by federal department</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Pennsylvania Congressman Tim Murphy has protested the Department of Health and Human Services regulation that will force employers to provide contraceptives and other services, even if they object to the services for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>4 Oct 2011 20:06:14 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Congressman_protests_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience_by_federal_department</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-04.html#US_Congressman_protests_attack_on_freedom_of_conscience_by_federal_department</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>French physicians increasingly object to providing abortion</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | An anonymous physician writing on a French language blog asserts that doctors in France are increasinlgy unwilling to perform abortions, and tolerate rather than accept the practice. Most apparently refuse to be involved for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>29 Sep 2011 20:04:34 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#French_physicians_increasingly_object_to_providing_abortion</link>
	<category>France-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#French_physicians_increasingly_object_to_providing_abortion</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US Catholic bishops form committee for religious liberty</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Citing serious challenges to religious liberty by the American government, the President of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has announced the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty.</description>
	<pubDate>29 Sep 2011 19:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Catholic_bishops_form_committee_for_religious_liberty</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Catholic_bishops_form_committee_for_religious_liberty</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Presidenet of Notre Dame University reminds Obama of promise</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The President of Notre Dame University has reminded the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services that President Obama promised to support "a sensible conscience clause." Rev. John Jenkins points out that a "sensible conscience clause" is lacking in the proposed regulation that would force Catholic institutions to pay for contraception and potentially embryocidal or abortificaient services.</description>
	<pubDate>28 Sep 2011 19:25:37 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#President_of_Notre_Dame_University_reminds_Obama_administration_of_promise</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#President_of_Notre_Dame_University_reminds_Obama_administration_of_promise</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Saskatchewan physician guidelines in dispute</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Seven Regina physicians have written to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, the regulatory authority for the province's physicians, to complain about a Guideline for Unplanned Pregnancy adopted earlier this year. While the letter questions the need for guidelines at all, it also appears to suggest that objecting physicians should be forced to refer patients for abortions if they are unwilling to perform or recommend the procedure themselves.</description>
	<pubDate>26 Sep 2011 19:24:22 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Saskatchewan_physician_guidelines_in_dispute</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Saskatchewan_physician_guidelines_in_dispute</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>UN committee fabricates claim in attempt to force abortion on Ireland</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| The UN Committee Against Torture has issued a report that demands that Ireland legalize abortion, suggesting that this is required by the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. [CAT Report]. The claim is a fabrication.</description>
	<pubDate>24 Sep 2011 19:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#UN_Committee_fabricates_claim_in_attempt_to_force_abortion_on_Ireland</link>
	<category>International-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#UN_Committee_fabricates_claim_in_attempt_to_force_abortion_on_Ireland</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Catholic Health Association speaks out on freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| The Catholic Health Association has filed comments supporting freedom of conscience for health care workers and institutions and protesting plans by the federal Department of Health and Human Services to revoke a regulation passed by the previous administration.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Sep 2011 19:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Catholic_Health_Association_speaks_out_on_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Catholic_Health_Association_speaks_out_on_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Most Portuguese physicians would refuse to provide euthanasia</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Responding to proposals to legalize euthanasia in Portugal, Miguel Oliveira da Silva, president of Portugal’s National Ethics Council for Life Sciences, states that 80 to 90 percent of Portuguese physicians would refuse to provide the procedure.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Sep 2011 19:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Most_Portuguese_physicians_would_refuse_to_provide_euthanasia</link>
	<category>Portugal-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Most_Portuguese_physicians_would_refuse_to_provide_euthanasia</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Catholic college in Colorado contemplates conscientious objection</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Regis University, a Jesuit institution in Colorado, is considering its legal options as a result of a new Colorado statute that demands that insurance plans provide contraceptives and potentially embryocidal or abortifacient drugs or devices.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Sep 2011 19:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Catholic_college_in_Colorado_contemplates_conscientious_objection</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Catholic_college_in_Colorado_contemplates_conscientious_objection</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US bishops continue to speak out on freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Catholic Archbishop Edwin F. O’Brien, Washington Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Wilmington Bishop W. Francis Malooly have written to US Dept. of Health and Human Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to protest the proposed regulation that would force employers to provide insurance for DA-approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures and related educational services. They describe the proposal as "a radically new and unprecedented attack on religious freedom.”</description>
	<pubDate>20 Sep 2011 19:16:52 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_bishops_continue_to_speak_out_on_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_bishops_continue_to_speak_out_on_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Right to health and right to euthanasia and assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A report by Special Rapporteur Anand Grover to the 18th Session of the UN Human Rights Council (Thematic study on the realization of the right to health of older persons) drew a warning from a representative of the Holy See, which noted that Grover introduced the topic of euthanasia and assisted suicide within the context of a discussion of "a holistic approach to health" that addresses "the process of dying."</description>
	<pubDate>16 Sep 2011 19:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Right_to_health_and_right_to_euthanasia_and_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>International-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Right_to_health_and_right_to_euthanasia_and_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Trade unions in United Kingdom seek protection of conscience rules</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | 58 trade unions representing 6 1/2 million workers in the United Kingdom have unanimously voted to support a "conscience clause" to protect journalists who refuse to participate in unethical activities.</description>
	<pubDate>12 Sep 2011 18:23:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Trade_unions_in_United_Kingdom_seek_protection_of_conscience_rules</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Trade_unions_in_United_Kingdom_seek_protection_of_conscience_rules</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Controversy in Philippines continues over reproductive health bill</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| The Philippines Congress has resumed consideration of a controversial Reproductive Health Bill bill that presents a threat to freedom of conscience among health care workers. The head of the country's Catholic Bishops' Conference said earlier this week that the Church's oppostion to the bill is &amp;ldquo;non-negotiable.”</description>
	<pubDate>10 Sep 2011 18:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Controversy_in_Philippines_continues_over_reproductive_health_bill</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Controversy_in_Philippines_continues_over_reproductive_health_bill</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Second court case in Canada seeks assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A Quebec woman suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is planning a challenge to Canada's law against assisted suicide. Her lawyer plans to launch the civil suit in the Quebec Superior Court.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Sep 2011 18:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#2nd_court_case_in_Canada_seeks_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#2nd_court_case_in_Canada_seeks_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Former UK physician continues to assist people seeking suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | 80 year old Dr. Michael Irwin of England, who was struck from the medical register for attempting to assist someone to commit suicide, publicly acknowledges that he frequently provides advice to people who want to go to Switzerland to commit suicide.</description>
	<pubDate>10 Sep 2011 18:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Former_UK_physician_continues_to_assist_people_seeking_suicide</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Former_UK_physician_continues_to_assist_people_seeking_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Claim: US medical schools discriminate against conscientious objectors</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Daniel Kuebler, Ph.D, a professor of biology at Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio, has published a column in the National Catholic Register that claims that medical schools in the United States discriminate against medical school applicants who have conscientious objections to abortion.</description>
	<pubDate>8 Sep 2011 17:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Claim:_US_medical_schools_discriminate_against_conscientious_objectors</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Claim:_US_medical_schools_discriminate_against_conscientious_objectors</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Dutch Medical Association demands referral for euthanasia</title>
	<description>News | The Dutch Physicians Association (KNMG) has published a policy on physician invovlement in euthanasia and assisted suicide that acknowledges that there is no right to the procedures in law, that the procedures are not part of the standard care offered by physicians, and that the views of physicians who object to the procedures must be respected. However, the policy also demands that objecting physicians promptly refer patients for euthanasia or assisted suicide.</description>
	<pubDate>8 Sep 2011 17:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Dutch_medical_association_demands_referral_for_euthanasia</link>
	<category>The Netherlands-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Dutch_medical_association_demands_referral_for_euthanasia</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US Catholic bishops urge Congress to support freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Wrting on behalf of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Daniel Cardinal DiNardo has urged the US Congress to support two bills that would support freedom of conscience currently denied under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (see HR1179 Respect for Rights of Conscience Act of 2011, and S1467 - Respect for Rights of Conscience Act of 2011).</description>
	<pubDate>7 Sep 2011 17:55:17 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Catholic_bishops_urge_Congress_to_support_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Catholic_bishops_urge_Congress_to_support_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Cardinal reaffirms support for Respect for Rights of Conscience Act</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt; | Congress should support a bill (H.R. 1179, S. 1467) that will close gaps in protection of conscience rights in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), especially in light of the threat to conscience rights posed by a new mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), said Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston in a September 7 letter to Congress.</description>
	<pubDate>7 Sep 2011 16:00:34 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Cardinal_Reaffirms_Support_for_Respect_for_Rights_of_Conscience_Act,_</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Cardinal_Reaffirms_Support_for_Respect_for_Rights_of_Conscience_Act,_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Irish senator addresses freedom of conscience in health care</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Speaking in Rome, Irish senator Ronan Mullen stated, &amp;ldquo;The challenge in a pluralist society is to accommodate people's freedom on conscience while at the same time acknowledging that what is lawful is going to go on in that society.”</description>
	<pubDate>3 Sep 2011 17:51:27 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Irish_senator_addresses_freedom_of_conscience_in_health_care</link>
	<category>Europe-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Irish_senator_addresses_freedom_of_conscience_in_health_care</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Administrative legalization of assisted suicide in United Kingdom</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| While assisted suicide is a criminal offence, the guidelines permit prosecution only in circumstances in which someone is pressured to commit suicide or the person assisting profits from their death. In essence, police and Crown counsel are acting as regulators of the practice. The advantage to this arrangement for objecting health care workers is that they cannot be pressured to assist in what remains (technically) a criminal offence.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Sep 2011 17:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Administrative_legalization_of_assisted_suicide_in_United_Kingdom</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Administrative_legalization_of_assisted_suicide_in_United_Kingdom</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Objecting Spanish physician would quit medicine</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Dr. Esteban Rodriguez Martin, a Spanish gynecologist, began a court case in 2008 to defend his freedom to refuse to be complicit in abortions. He has limited his practice to working with women in their third trimesters in order to avoid having to provide prenatal diagnoses that are usually used to facilitate eugenic abortions. He acknowledges that, if he loses the case, he may have to quit the practice of medicine.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Sep 2011 17:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Objecting_Spanish_physician_would_quite_medicine_</link>
	<category>Spain-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Objecting_Spanish_physician_would_quite_medicine_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US Conference of Catholic Bishops protests contraceptive mandate</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| The US Conference of Catholic Bishops has submitted a comment on the interim regulation promulgated by the US Department of Health and Human Services that will force employers to provide health insurance coverage for contraceptives.</description>
	<pubDate>31 Aug 2011 17:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Conference_of_Catholic_Bishops_protests_contraceptive_mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Conference_of_Catholic_Bishops_protests_contraceptive_mandate</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Prominent RCs write to Sebelius on conscience protections</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt; | These are the kinds of Catholics that the Obama administration has reached out to in the past, especially during the battle over health care reform, and so the impact of their call for more expansive conscience protections is likely to be heard in the White House. Indeed, the full list reads like a "Who's Who" of prominent Catholics whose politics tilt to the left.</description>
	<pubDate>26 Aug 2011 15:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Prominent_RCs_Write_To_Sebelius_on_Conscience_Protections</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Prominent_RCs_Write_To_Sebelius_on_Conscience_Protections</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Study suggests most US obstetricians will not perform abortions</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A survey of 1800 US obstetrician/gynaecologists found that 97% had encountered patients seeking abortion, but only 14% were willing to provide the procedure. &lt;a href="http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2011/09000/Abortion_Provision_Among_Practicing.16.aspx"&gt;("Abortion Provision Among Practicing Obstetrician–Gynecologists." &lt;/a&gt;Stulberg, Debra B. MD, MAPP; Dude, Annie M. MD, PhD; Dahlquist, Irma BS; Curlin, Farr A. MD. Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology: September 2011 - Volume 118 - Issue 3 - p 609–614doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ad973). Given the constant demands that medical professionals provide abortions, the study underlines the importance of protection of conscience legislation.</description>
	<pubDate>24 Aug 2011 12:50:17 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Study_suggests_most_US_obstetricians_will_not_perform_abortions</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Study_suggests_most_US_obstetricians_will_not_perform_abortions</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Revised Utah protection of conscience statute</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Law&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; Text of revised Utah protection of conscience law.</description>
	<pubDate>20 Aug 2011 22:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws/usa/USA-Law-06.html#Utah</link>
	<category>USA-Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws/usa/USA-Law-06.html#Utah</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Concerns for freedom of conscience among UK pharmacists</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Telegraph reported earlier this month that a new guideline for pharmacists circulated by the General Pharmaceutical Council (Britain's pharmacy regulator) told pharmacists "For the first time . . . that their right to conscientious objection on religious grounds is secondary to the contractual demands of employers, such as the NHS." A Catholic pharmacist quoted in the report was concerned that some pharmacists would become unemployable, and a spokesman for the Thomas More Legal Centre warned that the guideline went too far in requiring an objector to facilitate access to a controversial service by referral. [&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8688899/Christian-chemists-will-be-forced-out-under-morning-after-pill-rules.html"&gt;Telegraph&lt;/a&gt;] The Council has since issued a news release stating that no new guidelines have been issued, though an existing guideline had been re-published and circulated.[&lt;a href="http://www.pharmacyregulation.org/news/regulatorclarifiesstandard34news4367.aspx"&gt;News release&lt;/a&gt;] The existing Code of Ethics (3.4) imposes an obligation on objectors to "refer patients and the public to other providers," which some would find unacceptable.</description>
	<pubDate>17 Aug 2011 19:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Concerns_for_freedom_of_conscience_among_UK_pharmacists</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Concerns_for_freedom_of_conscience_among_UK_pharmacists</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Hospital backs down when challenged by nurses</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Two nurses in the United Kingdom objected, for reasons of conscience, to working in a weekly medical abortion clinic in their hospital, where the abortifacient drug mifepristone was provided to patients. Hospital administration told them that they had no choice but to participate. The &lt;a href="http://www.thomasmorelegal.org.uk/"&gt;Thomas More Legal Centre &lt;/a&gt;wrote to the hospital, pointing out that the nurses had an absolute right to refuse to participate under &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws/united-kingdom/law-uk01.html"&gt;the protection of conscience provision in the Abortion Act.&lt;/a&gt; The Center aslo warned the hospital that the Equality Act prohibited any discrimination against or harassment of the nurses based on their belief in the sanctity of life. The hospital first attempted to require the nurses to work in the clinic, without administering the drugs, but this was rejected as involving unacceptable complicity in the act of abortion. Ultimately, the hospital conceded the point and the nurses were assigned to other duties. [&lt;a href="http://spuc-director.blogspot.com/2011/08/equality-legislation-is-used-to-defend.html"&gt;SPUC&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>13 Aug 2011 19:45:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Hospital_backs_down_when_challenged_by_nurses_</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Hospital_backs_down_when_challenged_by_nurses_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Equality legislation used to defend conscientioius objection to abortion</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Repression&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;John Smeaton&lt;/strong&gt; | Congratulations to the Thomas More Legal Centre who successfully backed two nurses when they refused to work in a weekly abortion clinic in their hospital. As a result of their representations, the hospital backed down without the matter going to court.</description>
	<pubDate>13 Aug 2011 19:57:42 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/repression/repression-059.html</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-Repression</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/repression/repression-059.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Arizona Court of Appeals upholds state protection of conscience law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Court Ruling&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;USA&lt;/strong&gt; | Since Planned Parenthood had challenged the entire statute, which included protection of conscience measures, the Court of Appeal also dealt with and rejected Planned Parenthood's arguments against freedom of conscience for health care workers. That part of the judgement is reproduced below.</description>
	<pubDate>11 Aug 2011 15:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal066.html</link>
	<category>USA-Court Ruling</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal066.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Mandatory contraceptive insurance coverage sparks controversy in USA</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The regulation promulgated by the US Department of Health and Human Services that employers will be required by law to provide health insurance coverage for contraceptives has been welcomed by a number of commentators and interest groups. The Washington Post &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-administrations-wise-decision-to-cover-contraceptives/2011/08/03/gIQACVdjsI_story.html"&gt;called it a "wise decision," &lt;/a&gt;and an editorial in a South Carolina newspaper &lt;a href="http://www.heraldonline.com/2011/08/09/3280152/free-birth-control-policy.html"&gt;said it makes "perfect sense." &lt;/a&gt;The Center for Reproductive Rights &lt;a href="http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/crr-hails-historic-government-decision-to-ensure-health-insurance-coverage-of-contracepti"&gt;described it as "a tremendous victory for women,"&lt;/a&gt; and it has been &lt;a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/victory-womens-health-hhs-announces-birth-control-will-be-covered-no-co-pays-37522.htm"&gt;applauded by Planned Parenthood&lt;/a&gt;. However, the move has been denounced by freedom of conscience advocates, especially observant Catholics who are to be forced to directly pay for and facilitate what they consider to be gravely immoral conduct. It appears to have caught some of them by surprise. "They defied the bishops to support President Barack Obama's health care overhaul," &lt;a href="http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Religious-groups-object-to-covering-birth-control-1753317.php"&gt;wrote the Associated Press&lt;/a&gt;. "Now Catholic hospitals are dismayed the law may force them to cover birth control free of charge to their employees." &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Catholic_Health_Association_Response"&gt;The Association said &lt;/a&gt;that it is "very concerned about the inadequacy of the conscience protections" in the rules. A spokesman for &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#USCCB:_HHS_Mandate_for_Contraceptive_and_Abortifacient_Drugs_Violates_Conscience_Rights"&gt;the US Conference of Catholic Bishops noted&lt;/a&gt; that the protection of conscience provision is so narrowly written that it will not apply to most Catholic institutions. He asked if it was the government's intention to force the withdrawal of the Church from the provision of health care and social services. Similar criticisms were offered by a number of other commentators, including Michael Sean Winters. Writing in the National Catholic Reporter, he &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065comment02.html"&gt;described the conscience provisions as "totally inadequate." &lt;/a&gt;The Catholic League for Relgious and Civil Rights &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Obama_Plays_Catch_22_with_Religious_Groups_"&gt;called the situation "even more pernicious than it looks." &lt;/a&gt;It pointed out that the current administration is moving to deny funds to religious groups that preferentially hire from within their own denominations to administer their social programmes and institutions, yet the regulation limits protection for freedom of conscience to religious entities set up precisely in that way. "If they are too religious, Catholic social service agencies risk losing federal funds, but if Catholic hospitals are not sufficiently religious, they cannot be exempt from carrying health insurance policies that transgress their religious tenets."</description>
	<pubDate>9 Aug 2011 19:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Mandatory_contraceptive_insurance_coverage_sparks_controversy_in_USA</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Mandatory_contraceptive_insurance_coverage_sparks_controversy_in_USA</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>New birth control requirements are a loss for conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Hannah C. Smith&lt;/strong&gt; | Last week, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued new federal regulations that run roughshod over the moral conscience of many Americans.</description>
	<pubDate>9 Aug 2011 09:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#New_birth_control_requirements_are_a_loss_for_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#New_birth_control_requirements_are_a_loss_for_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Eggs harvested from dead woman</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The organs of a 17 year old woman who died after being struck by a car in Israel have been donated to four recipients. In addition, her family obtained a court order to harvest and freeze her eggs. For the moment, the hospital will not fertilize the ova without a court order. This is the first such incident in Israel. [&lt;a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/dead-woman-s-ova-harvested-after-court-okays-family-request-1.377495"&gt;Haaretz&lt;/a&gt;] The case illustrates the potential for conflicts of conscience among health care workers, both with respect to the harvesting of the eggs and their later fertilization and implantation.</description>
	<pubDate>8 Aug 2011 19:38:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Eggs_harvested_from_dead_woman</link>
	<category>Israel-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Eggs_harvested_from_dead_woman</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>"Ethics of the profession" in retrospect</title>
	<description>An ABC news report [&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/WomensHealth/sterilizing-sick-poor-cut-welfare-costs-north-carolinas/story?id=14093458"&gt;North Carolina's History of Eugenics&lt;/a&gt;] has described the treatment of men, womena nd children who were sterilized during the 45 year span of a state sterilization programme operated on eugenic principles. "Eugenics in the U.S. is something that's still not nationally known. People associate it with Nazis; they don't realize that the U.S. did it too," says Rebecca Kluchin, an assistant professor of History at California State University, Sacramento who specializes in the U.S. eugenics programs." The story graphically illustrates that "the ethics of the profession" of medicine sometimes leave much to be desired, thus underlining the importance of preserving freedom of consience for health care workers.</description>
	<pubDate>4 Aug 2011 19:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Ethics_of_the_profession_in_retrospect</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Ethics_of_the_profession_in_retrospect</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Physician assisted suicide/euthanasia court challenge to be expedited</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Supreme Court of British Columbia has agreed to expedite the hearing of a challenge to Canada's law against assisted suicide and euthanasia. The case will now begin on 15 November, 2011. The move is in response to a request from one of the plaintiff's, Gloria Taylor, who suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease. Taylor joined an action begun by three other plaintiffs and the BC Civil Liberties Association. The goal is to legalize physician-assisted suicide and physician-provided euthanasia. [&lt;a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-judge-agrees-to-expedite-right-to-die-trial/article2118412/"&gt;Globe and Mail&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>3 Aug 2011 16:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Physician_assisted_suicide/euthanasia_court_challenge_to_be_expedited</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Physician_assisted_suicide/euthanasia_court_challenge_to_be_expedited</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Regulation 45 CFR Part 147 (2011) Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;US Dept. of Health and Human Services&lt;/strong&gt; |  This document contains amendments to the interim final regulations implementing the rules for group health plans and health insurance coverage in the group and individual markets under provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act regarding preventive health services.</description>
	<pubDate>3 Aug 2011 15:46:47 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal065.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Obama plays catch 22 with religious groups</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights&lt;/strong&gt; |. . .the Obama administration is playing Catch-22 with religious employers. If they are too religious, Catholic social service agencies risk losing federal funds, but if Catholic hospitals are not sufficiently religious, they cannot be exempt from carrying health insurance policies that transgress their religious tenets.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Aug 2011 15:54:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Obama_Plays_Catch_22_with_Religious_Groups_</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Obama_Plays_Catch_22_with_Religious_Groups_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience regs are totally inadequate</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt; | . . .to be clear, the issue is not contraception. There is no effort to force our views on contraception on the whole society, only an insistence that society’s views not be foisted on us. Many Catholics disagree with the Church’s teaching on contraception to be sure, but if the government can dictate to us on this point, it can dictate to us on any point. . .</description>
	<pubDate>2 Aug 2011 15:43:48 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Regs_Are_Totally_Inadequate</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Regs_Are_Totally_Inadequate</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Catholic Health Association response to women's preventive services regulations</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Catholic Health Association&lt;/strong&gt; |CHA is very concerned about the inadequacy of the conscience protections with respect to the coverage of contraception. As it stands, the language is not broad enough to protect our Catholic health providers. Catholic hospitals are a significant part of this nation's health care, especially in the care of the most vulnerable. It is critical that we be allowed to serve our nation without compromising our conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Aug 2011 15:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Catholic_Health_Association_Response</link>
	<category>USA-Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Catholic_Health_Association_Response</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>HHS mandate for contraceptive and abortifacient drugs violates conscience rights</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt; | The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) sharply criticized a new HHS &amp;ldquo;preventive services” mandate requiring private health plans to cover female surgical sterilization and all drugs and devices approved by the FDA as contraceptives, including drugs which can attack a developing unborn child before and after implantation in the mother’s womb.</description>
	<pubDate>1 Aug 2011 15:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#USCCB:_HHS_Mandate_for_Contraceptive_and_Abortifacient_Drugs_Violates_Conscience_Rights</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#USCCB:_HHS_Mandate_for_Contraceptive_and_Abortifacient_Drugs_Violates_Conscience_Rights</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Senate Bill 1467: Respect for Rights of Conscience Act 2011</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;USA &lt;/strong&gt;| Text of Respect for Rights of Conscience Act 2011</description>
	<pubDate>2 Aug 2011 22:34:10 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal13a.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal13a.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill introduced in US Senate</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | US Senator Roy Blunt has introduced&lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal13a.htm"&gt; Senate Bill 1467&lt;/a&gt;, the &amp;ldquo;Respect for Rights of Conscience Act of 2011." The bill is identical to a &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal13.htm"&gt;House of Representatives bill &lt;/a&gt;of the same name. Co-sponsors are Senators Marco Rubio and Kelly Ayotte.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Aug 2011 16:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_US_Senate</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_US_Senate</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US Department issues draft regulation on mandatory contraception coverage</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The US Department of Health and Human Services has issued an interim regulation that will enact the recommendation of the Institute of Medicine that contraception and sterilization must be offered in health insurance plans provided by employers, without charge to employees. The public will have 60 days to respond to the draft before it is finalized.[&lt;a href="http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2011pres/08/20110801b.html"&gt;HHS news release&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>1 Aug 2011 16:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Department_issues_draft_regulation_on_mandatory_contraception_coverage</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#US_Department_issues_draft_regulation_on_mandatory_contraception_coverage</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Anti-RH bill rally in Philippines</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Catholic diocese of Pagadian and Human Life International organized a rally against the proposed &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal055.html"&gt;Reproductive Health Bill&lt;/a&gt;. About 8000 people attended the event in the city's public plaza. [&lt;a href="http://www.cbcpnews.com/?q=node/16433"&gt;CBCP News&lt;/a&gt;] The rally demonstrates the controversial nature of the bill and the likelihood of conflicts of conscience among health care workers if it passes in its present form.</description>
	<pubDate>30 Jul 2011 16:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Anti-RH_bill_rally</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Anti-RH_bill_rally</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Euthanasia-assisted suicide bill in South Australia</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;a href="http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/B/CURRENT/CRIMINAL%20LAW%20CONSOLIDATION%20(MEDICAL%20DEFENCES%20-%20END%20OF%20LIFE%20ARRANGEMENTS)%20AMENDMENT%20BILL%202011_HON%20STEPH%20KEY%20MP/B_AS%20INTRODUCED%20IN%20HA/CRIMINAL%20ARRANGEMENTS%20AMENDMENT%20BILL%202011.UN.PDF"&gt;Bill No. 88&lt;/a&gt;, an amendment to the criminal law in South Australia, will, if passed, make it possible for physicians to provide assisted suicide and euthanasia. In comparison to other euthanasia and assisted suicide bills it is unusual, since it does not propose to legalize either procedure per se. Instead, it provides a series of defences for physicians who are charged for providing euthanasia or assisted suicide. Since the standard of proof in a criminal trial is proof beyond reasonable doubt, the defences would probably lower the likelihood of prosecution as well as conviction. From the perspective of freedom of conscience, this would not adversely affect physicians who object to the procedures, which would technically remain criminal offences. Further: the absence of any kind of approval process that would implicate the medical profession or the state would make it very unlikely that pressure would be brought to bear on objectors by colleagues or the state. Long term consequences are more difficult to predict, since a similar arrangement with respect to abortion following the Bourne case in England eventually proved to be an early step in the legalization of the procedure. Once abortion was legalized in Britain, conscientious objectors to abortion began to experience discrimination and coercion. [See &lt;a href="file:///D:/Project/My%20Documents/Project/repression/repression-027.html"&gt;Question of Conscience&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>28 Jul 2011 16:20:07 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Euthanasia-assisted_suicide_bill_in_South_Australia</link>
	<category>Australia-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Euthanasia-assisted_suicide_bill_in_South_Australia</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Respecting, protecting differences of conscience strengthens health care</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Stephen Schneck&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; | The issue facing Sebelius is not contraception. The issue is conscience protection. The right of an American citizen to receive birth control or to obtain Plan B does not trump the right of a doctor to decline to participate in procuring an abortion. Nor does it trump the right of a citizen to decline to purchase a policy that pays for procedures they find morally repugnant.</description>
	<pubDate>28 Jul 2011 18:25:24 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Respecting,_protecting_differences_of_conscience_strengthens_health_care</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Respecting,_protecting_differences_of_conscience_strengthens_health_care</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Nurses express concern about proposed withdrawal of nutrition/hydration</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A nurse supervisor responsible for the care of a minimally conscious woman whose relatives want to stop assisted nutrition and hydration has filed a statement with the Court of Protection in the United Kingdom. The nurse reports that the woman "responds to music and conversation and tries to communicate," and expresses concern that the family does not understand the practical effects of withdrawing food and fluids. The case is the first application in Britain to withdraw food and fluids from a patient who is minimally conscious rather than in a "persistent vegetative state." [&lt;a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/nurses-speak-out-against-family-in-righttodie-case-2325923.html"&gt;Independent&lt;/a&gt;] The nurse's statement indicates the potential for conflicts of conscience among health care workers in such situations.</description>
	<pubDate>26 Jul 2011 16:18:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Nurses_express_concern_about_proposed_withdrawal_of_nutrition/hydration</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Nurses_express_concern_about_proposed_withdrawal_of_nutrition/hydration</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Access to Birth Control bill introduced in US Congress</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt; | Identical bills have been introduced in the US House of Representatives (&lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c112:1:./temp/~c112TsPtXa::"&gt;HR2659&lt;/a&gt;) and US Senate (&lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c112:2:./temp/~c112iv1DeF::"&gt;S1415&lt;/a&gt;) that have been described as attacks on freedom of conscience for pharmacists. The bills' recommended "congressional findings" include the clearly erroneous statement that access to contraception "is a protected fundamental right in the United States"; it is not. The "findings" also exclude reference to the potential embryocidal or abortifacient effects of some products that are marketed as contraceptives. However, the bills would not apply to any pharmacy that does not stock contraceptives, so they would have no effect on pharmacies operated by those who object to that line of product. The obligations to facilitate access to such products is imposed only on those who normally provide them. Finally, the obligation to facilitate access lies with the pharmacy, not with individual pharmacists, so the accommodation of objecting pharmacists would still be possible.</description>
	<pubDate>26 Jul 2011 16:12:11 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Access_to_Birth_Control_bill_introduced_in_US_Congress</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Access_to_Birth_Control_bill_introduced_in_US_Congress</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Catholic opposition to recommendation for contraceptive mandates</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Catholic Medical Association and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, among others, have spoken out against the recommendations that employers should be made to provide health insurance converage for contraception and sterilization. In addition to arguments against contraception per se, they protest that it is offensive to principles of freedom of conscience and religion to compel individuals and denominational institutions to facilitate conduct that they believe to be wrong.[&lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#CMA_Criticizes_IOM_Recommendation"&gt;CMA news release&lt;/a&gt;] [&lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Bishops’_Pro-Life_Chair_Strongly_Opposes_Recommended_Mandate"&gt;DiNardo news release&lt;/a&gt;] [&lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#In_Wake_of_Proposed_Contraceptive_Mandate,"&gt;USCCB news release&lt;/a&gt;] [&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/wheres-the-religious-freedom-in-birth-control-mandate/2011/07/20/gIQAsZZFQI_blog.html"&gt;USCCB spokesman&lt;/a&gt;] [&lt;a href="http://ncronline.org/news/justice/respecting-protecting-differences-conscience-strengthens-health-care"&gt;National Catholic Reporter&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>25 Jul 2011 16:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Catholic_opposition_to_recommendation_for_contraceptive_mandates</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Catholic_opposition_to_recommendation_for_contraceptive_mandates</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Suggestions for the future of bioethics</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Daniel P. Sulmasy&lt;/strong&gt; | Where should bioethics go next? I will make six suggestions. I am sure they will not be uniformly popular, but I’d like to think they might provoke some interesting discussion.</description>
	<pubDate>24 Jul 2011 21:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical127.html</link>
	<category>Ethical Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical127.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>In Wake of Proposed Contraceptive Mandate, Cardinal DiNardo Urges Congress to Support Respect for Rights of Conscience Act</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt; | Responding to a proposal from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) that private health plans be required to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the U.S. bishops urged Congress to support the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act (H.R. 1179).</description>
	<pubDate>22 Jul 2011 22:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#In_Wake_of_Proposed_Contraceptive_Mandate,</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#In_Wake_of_Proposed_Contraceptive_Mandate,</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience and mandates</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Michael Sean Winters&lt;/strong&gt; | Earlier this year, when the administration released its new conscience regulations, I made the point then, and it remains relevant to this discussion: Liberals should be ashamed of themselves when they cease to defend the rights of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Jul 2011 15:44:56 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_and_Mandates</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_and_Mandates</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Anti-RH bill rally in Philippines</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A gathering of about 4,000 Catholic students was held at the University of Santo Tomas (UST) in Manila to celebrate the anniversary of the encyclical Humanae Vitae and to oppose the controversial &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal055.html"&gt;Reproductive Health bill &lt;/a&gt;currently being considered by the Philippines Congress. [&lt;a href="http://www.gmanews.tv/story/226965/nation/4000-students-join-largest-anti-rh-forum"&gt;GMA News&lt;/a&gt;] If the bill becomes law in its current form, it is likely to adversely affect health care workers who object to contraception or potentially embryocidal drugs or devices for reasons of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>21 Jul 2011 16:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Anti-RH_bill_rally_in_Philippines</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Anti-RH_bill_rally_in_Philippines</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>CMA Criticizes IOM Recommendation on Mandating Contraceptive Coverage</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Catholic Medical Association&lt;/strong&gt; |  The Catholic Medical Association released the following statement after the Institute of Medicine effectively recommended, on July 19, 2011, that insurance companies and plans be forced to subsidize "the full range of FDA-approved contraceptive methods"</description>
	<pubDate>20 Jul 2011 22:30:27 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#CMA_Criticizes_IOM_Recommendation</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#CMA_Criticizes_IOM_Recommendation</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Bishops’ Pro-Life Chair Strongly Opposes Recommended Mandate for Birth Control, Sterilization in Private Health Plans</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;US Conference of Catholic Bishops&lt;/strong&gt; |  Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, strongly opposed the recommendation of the Institute of Medicine that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate coverage of surgical sterilization and all FDA-approved birth control in private health insurance plans nationwide.</description>
	<pubDate>19 Jul 2011 22:27:19 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Bishops_Pro-Life_Chair_Strongly_Opposes_Recommended_Mandate</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Bishops_Pro-Life_Chair_Strongly_Opposes_Recommended_Mandate</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Institute of Medicine recommends mandatory contraception insurance coverage</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | An American organization, the Institute of Medicine, has issued a report (Clinical Preventive Services for Women: Closing the Gaps) that recommends that "the full range of Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counselling for women with reproductive capacity" be provided by insurance plans by employers without charge to their employees. The recommendation will be controversial among those who have moral objections to sterilization and contraception, and among those who are concerned that some products marketed as contraceptives may have embryodical or abortifacient effects, causing the death of an embryo before or after implantation. [&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/20/contraceptive-recommendation-creates-new-controversy-for-health-care-law/#ixzz1SjxHJt9M"&gt;Fox News&lt;/a&gt;]</description>
	<pubDate>19 Jul 2011 15:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Institute_of_Medicine_recommends_mandatory_contraception_insurance_coverage</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Institute_of_Medicine_recommends_mandatory_contraception_insurance_coverage</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Survey of attitudes about conscientious objection in United Kingdom</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A survey of 733 students in four medical schools in the United Kindgom (Cardiff University, King’s college London, Leeds University and St George’s University of London) has disclosed that almost half believe that physicians should be allowed to refuse to perform procedures to which they object for moral, cultural or religious reasons. For some respondents, this included treating someone who is drunk or high on drugs. A significant number of the students would not perform abortions after 24 weeks, nor because of failed contraception. This elicited the concern from various quarters about what is perceived as a growing unwillingness of physicians to provide abortions.[Sophie L.M. Strickland, &lt;a href="http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2011/06/29/jme.2011.042770.abstract"&gt;Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey&lt;/a&gt;. J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/jme.2011.042770] [&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/18/doctors-abortion-views"&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;] [&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8645226/Half-of-medical-students-object-to-post-24-weeks-abortion.html"&gt;The Telegraph&lt;/a&gt;] The study warrants attention, because to extend grounds for objection to non-moral reasons (culture) and to what could be distaste or difficulty (drug or alcohol intoxicated patients) is not justifiable. Ultimately, such attitudes are likely to undermine public support for freedom of conscience for health care workers.</description>
	<pubDate>18 Jul 2011 15:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Survey_of_attitudes_about_conscientious_objection_in_United_Kingdom</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Survey_of_attitudes_about_conscientious_objection_in_United_Kingdom</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Spanish group protests changes to medical code of ethics</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The National Association for the Defense of the Right to Conscientious Objection (&lt;a href="http://www.andoc.es/"&gt;La Asociación Nacional Para La Defensa Del Derecho de Objeción de Consciencia&lt;/a&gt;) in Spain is protesting what it describes as the secretive manner in which the country's Collegial Medical Organization adopted changes to its code of ethics. According to the Association, the changes, which may adversely affect conscientious objectors to abortion, were not to be discussed until September.[</description>
	<pubDate>14 Jul 2011 15:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Spanish_group_protests_changes_to_medical_code_of_ethics</link>
	<category>Spain-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Spanish_group_protests_changes_to_medical_code_of_ethics</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Workplace prejudice against Christians in the United Kingdom</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Britain's Equality and Human Rights Commission is supporting four Christians who have brought religious discrimination cases to the European Court of Human Rights.  According tothe Commission, judges in the United Kingdom have failed to interpret the law broadly enough when dealing with Christian victims of religious discrimination.  The Commission is urging a policy of accommodation of relgious belief.  Meanwhile,  the Church of England General Synod has been told that some employers consider any manifestation of religious belief offensive, and that Christians find work environments increasingly difficult.</description>
	<pubDate>12 Jul 2011 15:35:12 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Workplace_prejudice_against_Christians_in_the_United_Kingdom</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#Workplace_prejudice_against_Christians_in_the_United_Kingdom</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>President Obama petitioned to restore conscience protections</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt;  | The Christian Medical Association (CMA) has sent a petition with over 61,000 signatures to President Barack Obama in support of freedom of conscience in health care.  In the accompanying letter, Dr. David Stevens, CEO of the Association, noted that the Obama administration had "gutted" a federal protection of conscience regulation, but, nonetheless, asked the President to "consider the voices and values of these many Americans and (a) restore a strong conscience-protecting regulation and (b) support and sign into law strong conscience-protecting legislation."</description>
	<pubDate>6 Jul 2011 15:30:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#President_Obama_petitioned_to_restore_conscience_protections</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-03.html#President_Obama_petitioned_to_restore_conscience_protections</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Christian Medical Association sends over 61,000 petitions to President Obama</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Christian Medical Association&lt;/strong&gt; | The Christian Medical Association (CMA, ) today sent to President Obama a letter on behalf of 61,154 individuals who signed a petition urging the President to uphold and enforce conscience rights in health care.</description>
	<pubDate>6 Jul 2011 22:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Christian_Medical_Association_Sends_Over_61,000_Petitions_</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Christian_Medical_Association_Sends_Over_61,000_Petitions_</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>ECLJ to the Council of Europe: Spain violates conscientious freedom of medical practitioners</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Repression&lt;/strong&gt; |&lt;strong&gt; Spai&lt;/strong&gt;n |The following news release describes official hostility to freedom of conscience that has developed in Spain since July, 2010, and the persecution of conscientious objectors.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Jun 2011 22:25:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/repression/repression-056.html</link>
	<category>Spain-Repression</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/repression/repression-056.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Suppression of freedom of conscience in Spain</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | On June 22, 2011, the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ) organized a public hearing at the Council of Europe, entitled &amp;ldquo;Spain: Violations of Medical Practitioner’s Freedom of Conscience”. It was conducted with the Spanish Defense Association of Conscientious Objection (ANDOC) and with the support of the European’s People’s Party. During the hearing, a detailed report of systematic violations of freedom of conscience among health care professionals was released.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Jun 2011 15:30:23 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Suppression_of_freedom_of_conscience_in_Spain</link>
	<category>Spain-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Suppression_of_freedom_of_conscience_in_Spain</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Louisiana Senate removes change to protection of conscience law</title>
	<description>An expansion of an existing protection of conscience statute in Louisiana contained in House Bill 636 was removed by the Louisiana Senate.  The change leaves the existing law intact.</description>
	<pubDate>14 Jun 2011 15:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Louisiana_Senate_removes_change_to_protection_of_conscience_law</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Louisiana_Senate_removes_change_to_protection_of_conscience_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Liberty of conscience is critical for individual doctors</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Dan Wooding&lt;/strong&gt; | "To sacrifice conscience and be concerned only with service provision is to destroy the heart and soul of medicine.”</description>
	<pubDate>13 Jun 2011 22:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical128.html</link>
	<category>Ethical Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical128.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Liberty of conscience critical for doctors</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Dr. Lachlan Dunjey, founder of Medicine with Morality, an Australian group, told a gathering of 220 Christian doctors and medical professionals meeting in Brisbane, Australia, that freedom of conscience "lies at the very heart of our integrity” and compels doctors "to refuse to participate in treatments they believe to be un-ethical."</description>
	<pubDate>13 Jun 2011 15:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Liberty_of_conscience_critical_for_doctors</link>
	<category>Australia-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Liberty_of_conscience_critical_for_doctors</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Emergency plan overturned</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Cristina Alarcon&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; Clearly, the state’s concept of &amp;ldquo;emergency” was fabricated in order to justify the imposition of a moral ideology on unwilling citizens.</description>
	<pubDate>6 Jun 2011 18:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal072.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal072.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Pope Benedict XVI: conscience critical to European survival</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Speaking to civic, business, and cultural representatives, members of the diplomatic corps and religious leaders in Zagreb, Pope Benedict XVI addressed the theme of conscience.  He described the theme as one that "cuts across all the different fields in which you are engaged and it is fundamental for a free and just society, both at national and supranational levels."</description>
	<pubDate>4 Jun 2011 15:26:23 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Pope_Benedict_XVI:_conscience_critical_to_European_survival</link>
	<category>Europe-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Pope_Benedict_XVI:_conscience_critical_to_European_survival</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Group identifies threat to freedom of conscience in Philippines RH bill</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | World Youth Alliance's Asia Pacific office in Manila has posted a new website about the controversial Philippines Reproductive Health bill.   Christopher White, international director of operations of WYA, has criticized the RH bill because, among other things, it lacks provisions for freedom of conscience and religious practice.  On this point he suggests that the bill's critics should "highlight freedom of conscience as an international human right which is universally recognized."</description>
	<pubDate>18 May 2011 15:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Group_identifies_threat_to_freedom_of_conscience_in_Philippines_RH_bill</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Group_identifies_threat_to_freedom_of_conscience_in_Philippines_RH_bill</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>European rights advocates support mob wrecking Berlin pharmacy</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | . . . Dr. Gudrun Kugler, a lawyer from Vienna, Austria, describes her presentation of a report to the European Union's  Fundamental Rights Agency. . . Next, I mention the case of a Berlin pharmacist who refuses to sell the morning after pill. Radical feminists smashed his windows and wrecked the pharmacy. &amp;ldquo;Rightly so,”says another participant of FRA’s Fundamental Rights Platform. &amp;ldquo;He violated the right of access to medical care!” Heavy nodding from the audience.  . .</description>
	<pubDate>17 May 2011 19:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#European_rights_advocates_support_mob_wrecking_Berlin_pharmacy</link>
	<category>Europe-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#European_rights_advocates_support_mob_wrecking_Berlin_pharmacy</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Philippines president warns civil disobedience could lead to sedition charges</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News &lt;/strong&gt;| Responding to statements from Catholic bishops in the Philippines to the effect that passage of the "RH" bill 
		could result in civil disobedience, President Benigno &amp;ldquo;Noynoy” Aquino III has said that civil disobedience would be a "serious offence," 
		referring specifically to sedition. . . .A Philippines journalist following the story comments that "reproductive health has become the single 
		biggest issue confronting the nation today and could be the tipping point for both P-Noy and the country as a whole." . . .the failure of the bill 
		to adequately address the issue of freedom of conscience for health care workers is particularly troubling. . .</description>
	<pubDate>16 May 2011 11:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Philippines_president_warns_civil_disobedience_could_lead_to_sedition_charges</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Philippines_president_warns_civil_disobedience_could_lead_to_sedition_charges</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Louisiana House Bill 636</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed Law&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Louisiana, USA&lt;/strong&gt; |  Protection of cosncience provision in LouisianaHB 636</description>
	<pubDate>12 May 2011 22:18:07 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/louisiana02.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/louisiana02.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Bishops consider civil disobedience in the Philippines</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Deogracias Iñiguez Jr., Catholic Bishop of Caloocan, Phiilippines, has warned that if the proposed reproductive health bill becomes law, Catholics will not be obliged to adhere to provisions that are contrary to their faith. Meanwhle, Archbishop Ramon Arguelles has said that dialogue with the president is "useless" and "we're going to have a total war now" against the bill. . .</description>
	<pubDate>12 May 2011 20:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Bishops_consider_civil_disobedience_in_Philippines</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Bishops_consider_civil_disobedience_in_Philippines</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Swedish Parliamentary Debate: Freedom of conscience in health care</title>
	<description>Society/Politics | Re: Resolution 1763(2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe | On 11 May, 2011 the Swedish Parliament debated the recommendations in a report from the Foreign Affairs Committee. Some of these concerned &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/eu/resolution-1763-2010.html"&gt;Resolution 1763(2010)&lt;/a&gt; of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which affirmed support for freedom of conscience for health care workers.</description>
	<pubDate>11 May 2011 22:14:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical04%202011-05-11kam.html</link>
	<category>Sweden-Society/Politics</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical04%202011-05-11kam.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Swedish Foreign Affairs Committee Report 2010/11:UU12</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Society/Politics&lt;/strong&gt; | Swedish Parliamentary Debate: Freedom of conscience in health care | Relevant background documents |This report from the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Swedish Parliament became the subject of a parliamentary debate in May, 2011. That part of the report relevant to PACE Resolution 1763 (2010), supporting freedom of conscience for health care workers, is reproduced here.</description>
	<pubDate>11 May 2011 22:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical05%202010-11-uu12.html</link>
	<category>Sweden-Society/Politics</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical05%202010-11-uu12.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Presentation to Parliament 2010/11:ER1 From Sweden's delegation at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Society/Politics&lt;/strong&gt; | Swedish Parliamentary Debate: &lt;br/&gt;Freedom of conscience in health care | Relevant background documents&lt;em&gt; |&lt;/em&gt; The following is extracted from a lengthy report to the Swedish parliament from Sweden's delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. The extract below is from a list of resolutions approved by the assembly. It refers to PACE Resolution1763 of October, 2010, affirming support for freedom of conscience of health care workers.</description>
	<pubDate>11 May 2011 22:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical07%202010-11-er1.html</link>
	<category>Sweden-Society/Politics</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical07%202010-11-er1.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Government Communication 2010/11: 54 Presentation of the activities of the Committee of Ministers, etc.</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Society/Politics&lt;/strong&gt; | Swedish Parliamentary Debate: Freedom of conscience in health care&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;| &amp;nbsp;Relevant background documents |&amp;nbsp; As indicated by the following table of contents, this report to the Swedish parliament covers the activities of the Committee of Ministers at the European Union during 2009 and the first half of 2010. &lt;a href="http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/eu/resolution-1763-2010.html"&gt;PACE Resolution 1763&lt;/a&gt; supporting freedom of conscience for health care workers is not mentioned because it was not adopted until the fall of 2010, subsequent to the period covered by this report.</description>
	<pubDate>11 May 2011 22:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical08%202010-11-54.html</link>
	<category>Sweden-Society/Politics</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical08%202010-11-54.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Motion 2010/11:U298 The Millenium Development Goals</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Society/Politics&lt;/strong&gt; | Swedish Parliamentary Debate: Freedom of conscience in health care | Relevant background documents | Sweden's Left Party (Vänsterpartiet) was horrified when the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe affirmed its support for freedom of conscience for health care workers by passing Resolution1763 in October, 2010.  In response, the Party proposed the following motion to the Swedish parliament.  Among other things, it asserted that Sweden should "actively work to repeal the resolution."</description>
	<pubDate>11 May 2011 22:06:39 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical06%202010-11-u298.html</link>
	<category>Sweden-Society/Politics</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/social-political/socialpolitical06%202010-11-u298.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>HHS Responds to Pro-life Letter, Defends Conscience Recission</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Medical Students for Life of America&lt;/strong&gt; |The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has officially responded to pro-life concerns over the recent conscience rescissions for medical students and medical professionals. . .</description>
	<pubDate>11 May 2011 11:10:49 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#HHS_Responds_to_Pro-life_Letter,_Defends_Conscience_Recission</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#HHS_Responds_to_Pro-life_Letter,_Defends_Conscience_Recission</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Commentary re: Regulation 45 CFR Part 88 (2011)</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt;This regulation, issued in December, 2008 by the Bush Administration, was revised by the Obama Administration and re-issued in February, 2011. . .</description>
	<pubDate>10 May 2011 23:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment01.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment01.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Ms. Magazine: freedom of conscience  leading to rampant substandard care in US</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | The spring issue of Ms. Magazine includes an article asserts that "substandard care [is] becoming rampant in the US" because of protection of conscience laws, and that Catholic bishops in the United States "are prohibiting doctors from practicing medicine and denying women essential reproductive care." . . .</description>
	<pubDate>10 May 2011 23:35:10 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Ms._Magazine:_freedom_of_conscience__leading_to_rampant_substandard_care_in_US</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/news-2011-02.html#Ms._Magazine:_freedom_of_conscience__leading_to_rampant_substandard_care_in_US</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill tracking now available in USA</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Freedom2Care coalition web site now offers a Legislative Action Center that utilizes Capwiz to make it easy for users to learn about and track bills, contact their legislators and more. . .</description>
	<pubDate>6 May 2011 23:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_tracking_now_available_in_USA</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_tracking_now_available_in_USA</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Philippines bishops withdraw from talks with president</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines has withdrawn from talks with President Benigno &amp;ldquo;Noynoy” Aquino III on the subject of the controversial "RH bill" that is opposed by the Catholic Church. . .</description>
	<pubDate>5 May 2011 23:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Philippines_bishops_withdraw_from_talks_with_president</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Philippines_bishops_withdraw_from_talks_with_president</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>HR3 No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed law&lt;/strong&gt; | This bill was introduced on 20 January, 2011 and passed by the US House of Representatives on 4 May, 2011.  This extract from the full text of the bill is the protection of conscience provision. . .</description>
	<pubDate>5 May 2011 00:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal09a.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal09a.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Amendment proposed to Louisiana protection of conscience law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt; News&lt;/strong&gt; | An amendment to an existing protection of conscience law in Louisiana has been included in a proposed bill concerning abortion.  The amendment would broaden the scope of existing protection  . .</description>
	<pubDate>4 May 2011 23:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Amendment_proposed_to_Louisiana_protection_of_conscience_law</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Amendment_proposed_to_Louisiana_protection_of_conscience_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US House of Representatives passes bill that includes conscience protections</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The US House of Representatives today passed a the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act," which includes a number of protection of conscience provisions.  The passage of the bill was applauded by the Alliance of Catholic Health Care. . .</description>
	<pubDate>4 May 2011 23:27:31 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#US_House_of_Representatives_passes_bill_that_includes_conscience_protections</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#US_House_of_Representatives_passes_bill_that_includes_conscience_protections</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Freedom of Conscience and Good Medical Practice: The AMA's position.</title>
	<description>&lt;STRONG&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/STRONG&gt; | &lt;STRONG&gt;Francis Sullivan&lt;/STRONG&gt; | *Video* from Conscience Laws and Healthcare Conference, 25th July 2009. The event was organised by the group- Doctors in Conscience in order to examine the implications The Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 will have on the practice of healthcare for conscience objectors.</description>
	<pubDate>2 May 2011 00:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037c.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037c.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Victorian Abortion Law and the threat to religious affiliated healthcare.</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Martin Laverty&lt;/strong&gt; | *Video* from Conscience Laws and Healthcare Conference, 25th July 2009. The event was organised by the group- Doctors in Conscience in order to examine the implications The Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 will have on the practice of healthcare for conscience objectors.</description>
	<pubDate>2 May 2011 00:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037d.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037d.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Victorian Abortion Law and the negative impact on professionalism for Victorian nurses.</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Jo Grainger&lt;/strong&gt; | *Video* from Conscience Laws and Healthcare Conference, 25th July 2009. The event was organised by the group- Doctors in Conscience in order to examine the implications The Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 will have on the practice of healthcare for conscience objectors.</description>
	<pubDate>2 May 2011 00:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037f.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037f.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Victorian Abortion Law and Conscientious Healthworkers: Is there a way out or do we need a test case?</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Nigel Preston&lt;/strong&gt; | *Video* from Conscience Laws and Healthcare Conference, 25th July 2009. The event was organised by the group- Doctors in Conscience in order to examine the implications The Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 will have on the practice of healthcare for conscience objectors.</description>
	<pubDate>2 May 2011 00:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037e.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037e.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Coercion of Doctors: What is happening to modern medicine?</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Dr Lachlan Dunjey&lt;/strong&gt; | *Video* from Conscience Laws and Healthcare Conference, 25th July 2009. The event was organised by the group- Doctors in Conscience in order to examine the implications The Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 will have on the practice of healthcare for conscience objectors.</description>
	<pubDate>2 May 2011 00:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037b.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037b.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Coercion of Conscience: A Federal Political Response.</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Julian McGauran&lt;/strong&gt; *Video* from Conscience Laws and Healthcare Conference, 25th July 2009. The event was organised by the group- Doctors in Conscience in order to examine the implications The Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008 will have on the practice of healthcare for conscience objectors.</description>
	<pubDate>2 May 2011 00:46:24 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037g.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037g.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The courage to refuse to cooperate in evil</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk&lt;/strong&gt; | Great care, discretion, and courage are required as we seek to avoid cooperation in medical situations where immoral practices may not only be tolerated, but even at times almost imposed on us.</description>
	<pubDate>30 Apr 2011 15:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical129.html</link>
	<category>Ethical Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical129.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>BC Civil Liberties Association asserts right to physician assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A statement of claim filed by the BC Civil Liberties Association and others in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, has launched a court case to legalize physician assisted suicide in Canada.  Of particular concern is the claim that patients have a right to the assistance of health care workers in committing suicide, . .</description>
	<pubDate>26 Apr 2011 23:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#BC_Civil_Liberties_Association_asserts_right_to_physician_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>Canada-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#BC_Civil_Liberties_Association_asserts_right_to_physician_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill proposed in Alabama</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Senate Bill 46, sponsored by Senator Cam Ward, offers protection to health care workers, institutions, and those paying for health care. . .</description>
	<pubDate>18 Apr 2011 23:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_proposed_in_Alabama</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_proposed_in_Alabama</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Alabama Senate Bill 14: Health Care Rights of Conscience Act</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed law&lt;/strong&gt; | Text of Alabama Senate Bill 14: Health Care Rights of Conscience Act</description>
	<pubDate>19 Apr 2011 00:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/alabama01.html</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/alabama01.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Western Defense of Conscience: Interview With Law Professor Rafael Navarro-Valls</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Zenit Interview&lt;/strong&gt; | The right to conscientious objection -- in areas ranging from health care to education -- is one of the most important legal battles being fought in the West, according to a law professor and author on the subject. . . On this question, Spanish jurist Rafael Navarro Valls, a law professor and regular contributor to ZENIT’s Spanish-language edition, has recently published a book, together with Javier Martínez Torrón, titled "Conflictos entre conciencia y ley. Las objeciones de conciencia" (Conflicts between Conscience and Law: Conscientious Objections).  ZENIT spoke with the author about the nature and limits of conscientious objection. . .</description>
	<pubDate>17 Apr 2011 00:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal062.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal062.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Spanish physician a 'public servant,' denied freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A court in Malaga, Spain, has ruled that a physician in a public medical facility in Antequerea, Spain, is a public employee, and thus his "duty to provide adequate health care" prevails over his conscientious objection to abortion.</description>
	<pubDate>15 Apr 2011 23:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Spanish_physician_a_public_servant,_denied_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>Spain-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Spanish_physician_a_public_servant,_denied_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The new conscience regulation: gutting protections, laying landmines</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Christian Medical Association&lt;/strong&gt; | Commentary re: Regulation 45 CFR Part 88 (2011)
 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. . .</description>
	<pubDate>15 Apr 2011 00:17:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment03.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment03.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Denying people right to conscience akin to fascism</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Greg Craven&lt;/strong&gt; | How can civil libertarians deny others a right they fight for? . . . This centrality of conscience in rights discourse hardly is surprising. Of all the rich and varied freedoms, the freedom to think and believe is fundamental. Without it people not only have fewer human rights, they are less human. . . .</description>
	<pubDate>14 Apr 2011 00:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037a.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal037a.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Arkansas House Bill 1983</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed law&lt;/strong&gt; |Text of the Healthcare Freedom of Conscience Act</description>
	<pubDate>14 Apr 2011 00:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/arkansas01.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/arkansas01.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Philippines RH bill of 2011: the shape of things to come?</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Sean Murphy&lt;/strong&gt; | The Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act of 2011.  ". . . The bill . . .  includes some provisions that are not specific to health care workers and institutions.  However, they affect fundamental freedoms of all citizens, and they are indicative of the broader social, legal and political environment within which the law will operate if the bill passes. . . ."</description>
	<pubDate>12 Apr 2011 23:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal055.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal055.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The "RH Bill" (2011) in brief</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed law&lt;/strong&gt; | The following sections of the  Philippines consolidated "RH Bill" of 2011 are of particular interest to freedom of conscience issues. . .</description>
	<pubDate>12 Apr 2011 23:59:33 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal055c-1.html</link>
	<category>Proposed Law-Philippines</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal055c-1.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>South Carolina House Bill 3408: Freedom of Conscience Act</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed law&lt;/strong&gt; | Text of the Freedom of Conscience Act . . .</description>
	<pubDate>11 Apr 2011 23:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/southcarolina01.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/southcarolina01.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>HR1179 Respect for Rights of Conscience Act of 2011</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed law&lt;/strong&gt; | To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to protect rights of conscience with regard to requirements for coverage of specific items and services. . .</description>
	<pubDate>11 Apr 2011 23:49:04 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal13.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/federal13.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Victory for Relgious Freedom Six Years in the Making</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News relase&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;American Center for Law and Justice&lt;/strong&gt; | The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) this week secured a sweeping victory for pro-life pharmacy owners in Illinois after a legal battle lasting six years. A state court in Illinois this week issued a decision striking down a state law that compels pharmacy owners to dispense Plan B and other forms of emergency contraception, even if doing so violates their religious or moral beliefs.</description>
	<pubDate>7 Apr 2011 00:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Victory_for_Religious_Freedom_Six_Years_in_the_Making</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/releases/releases-2011.html#Victory_for_Religious_Freedom_Six_Years_in_the_Making</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Alaska Senate Bill 14</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposed law&lt;/strong&gt; | An Act providing for the protection and reasonable accommodation of a health care provider's expression of conscience pertaining to a health care service; and providing for immunity, an exception, and prohibition of discrimination for an expression of conscience by a health care provider. . . .</description>
	<pubDate>6 Apr 2011 23:47:04 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/alaska01.htm</link>
	<category>USA-Proposed Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws-proposed/usa/alaska01.htm</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Illinois ruling supports freedom of conscience for pharmacists</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | A judge of the Circuit Court sitting in Springfield, Illinois, has ruled that an "emergency" state regulation enacted by the Governor Rod Blagojevich six years ago was intended to prevent pharmacists from acting on their religious convictions.  Thus, he held, the regulation violated the state's Health Care Right of Conscience Act, the Illinois Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and the Free Exercise of Religion Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. . .</description>
	<pubDate>6 Apr 2011 23:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Illinois_ruling_supports_freedom_of_conscience_for_pharmacists</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-02.html#Illinois_ruling_supports_freedom_of_conscience_for_pharmacists</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>US Dept. of Health and Human Services misrepresents federal conscience laws</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The US Department of Health and Human Services . . . is . . . supposed to undertake public education and outreach on freedom of conscience in health care. However, its website misrepresents the Church Amendments,. . . The Department appears to have overlooked other relevant federal statutes, some of which refer to procedures other than abortion . . .</description>
	<pubDate>31 Mar 2011 19:32:51 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#US_Dept._of_Health_and_Human_Services_misrepresents_federal_conscience_laws</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#US_Dept._of_Health_and_Human_Services_misrepresents_federal_conscience_laws</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>American activist group and UNFPA attack freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; |The Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), an American activist organization with multi-national connections, has joined the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) in attacking freedom of conscience among health care workers who object to contracption for moral or ethical reasons. . .</description>
	<pubDate>31 Mar 2011 19:31:46 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#American_activist_group_and_UNFPA_attack_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>International-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#American_activist_group_and_UNFPA_attack_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Obama Administration Rejects Conscience Protections</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt; William Saunders &amp; Anna Franzonello&lt;/strong&gt; | An issue of paramount importance for medical professionals is the protection of their right to conscience—their freedom to refuse or decline to do practices they oppose on religious or moral grounds. A February decision by the Obama administration, however, sweeps aside conscience protections instituted under President Bush. . .</description>
	<pubDate>31 Mar 2011 00:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Obama_Administration_Rejects_Conscience_Protections</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Obama_Administration_Rejects_Conscience_Protections</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Freedom of Conscience Act passes South Carolina lower house</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The House of Representatives in South Carolina has passed HB3408, the Freedom of Conscience Act.  The bill provides protection for employees, health care institutions, health care providers, insurers and students . . .</description>
	<pubDate>30 Mar 2011 19:30:06 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Freedom_of_Conscience_Act_passes_South_Carolina_lower_house</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Freedom_of_Conscience_Act_passes_South_Carolina_lower_house</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Anglican bishop warns against threat to freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali, former Anglican Bishop of Rochester, England, has warned that aggressive secularism is leading to an  &amp;ldquo;encroaching totalitarianism” that has become a threat to freedom of conscience.</description>
	<pubDate>25 Mar 2011 19:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Anglican_bishop_warns_against_threat_to_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Anglican_bishop_warns_against_threat_to_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Utah has new protection of conscience law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Governor of Utah has signed House Bill 353, the Abortion Freedom of Conscience Act.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Mar 2011 19:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Utah_has_new_protection_of_conscience_law</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Utah_has_new_protection_of_conscience_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Secularism and freedom of conscience and religion</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | . . . the European Court of Human Rights reversed a lower court decision and affirmed that crucifixes may be displayed in public school classrooms in Italy.  . . . concurring judgements filed by Judges Bonello and Power directly addressed the relationship between secularism and freedom of conscience and religion.  .  .</description>
	<pubDate>23 Mar 2011 19:20:56 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Secularism_and_freedom_of_conscience_and_religion</link>
	<category>Europe-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Secularism_and_freedom_of_conscience_and_religion</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Protection of conscience bill introduced in US House of Representatives</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | HR1179, Respect for Rights of Conscience Act of 2011, has been introduced in the US House of Representatives. .  .</description>
	<pubDate>17 Mar 2011 19:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_US_House_of_Representatives</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Protection_of_conscience_bill_introduced_in_US_House_of_Representatives</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Letter to Secretary Sebelius from Medical Students for Life et al</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submission&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;| &lt;strong&gt;Medical Students for Life of America&lt;/strong&gt; |We write to you today as medical students and medical professionals concerned by your Department’s February announcement that it is rescinding of most of the Bush Administration’s conscience protections. As future medical professionals, we feel that your decision must be reconsidered for the future of the medical profession.</description>
	<pubDate>16 Mar 2011 21:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment04.html</link>
	<category>Submission</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment04.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Medical students and professionals protest weakening conscience protection</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | American Medical Students for Life, Students for Life, representatives of the Christian Medical Association, Catholic Medical Association and the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists have written a letter to Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, to protest the weakening of a protection of conscience regulation. . .</description>
	<pubDate>16 Mar 2011 19:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Medical_students_and_professionals_protest_weakening_of_conscience_protection</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Medical_students_and_professionals_protest_weakening_of_conscience_protection</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Clarifying the clarification: College of Physicians &amp; Surgeons of Saskatchewan linkeline on Unplanned Pregnancy</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Background&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Sean Murphy&lt;/strong&gt; | Reports in the Toronto Sun and Edmonton Sun in February, 2011, stated that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan would henceforth require physicians who refuse to perform abortion to refer patients to other physicians to obtain the procedure.1 These reports were false. . .</description>
	<pubDate>13 Mar 2011 19:35:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/abortion/abortion33.html</link>
	<category>Background</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-background/abortion/abortion33.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Progressive Case for Conscience Protection</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Robert K. Vischer&lt;/strong&gt; | . . . &amp;ldquo;Conscience” is not a code word for abortion restrictions, and the liberty of conscience is too important to let it become the exclusive property of conservatives. Conscience is not the only value that matters in our health care debates, but there is a disturbing trend among progressives of acting as though it does not matter at all. . .</description>
	<pubDate>9 Mar 2011 01:05:48 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal064.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal064.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>American Civil Liberties Union opposes freedom of conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The American Civil Liberties Union has expressed opposition to Alaskan Senate Bill 14, which would ensure respect for freedom of conscience of heatlh care employees who have notified employers of their objections to services or procedures. . .</description>
	<pubDate>7 Mar 2011 19:17:30 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#American_Civil_Liberties_Union_opposes_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#American_Civil_Liberties_Union_opposes_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Hostility to religious freedom evident in Europe</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Speaking in Malta, Professor Roger Trigg, Academic Director of the Centre for the Study of Religion in Public Life at Kellogg College, Oxford, and an Advisor to the Protection of Conscience Project, addressed the theme &amp;ldquo;Free to Believe? A Religious Conscience in a Secular Society.”  . . . Professor Trigg noted that religious viewpoints are frequently not respected or even accommodated, citing the threat by the Irish government to criminally prosecute marriage registrars unwiling to register 'marriages' by same-sex couples.  . . .</description>
	<pubDate>7 Mar 2011 19:08:25 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Hostility_to_religious_freedom_evident_in_Europe</link>
	<category>Europe-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Hostility_to_religious_freedom_evident_in_Europe</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The costs of taking conscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ethicaly Commentary&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Michael A. Fragoso&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; There is already a growing physician shortage . . . The shortage will increase without any of the supply reductions that are likely to occur as a result of decertifying practicing obstetricians who refuse to perform abortions and deterring future obstetricians who will choose a different career or specialty rather than violate their consciences.</description>
	<pubDate>2 Mar 2011 19:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical132.html</link>
	<category>Ethical Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical132.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Roe to the rescue?  Roe v. Wade could prove an unlikely source of pro-life conscience protection</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Mark Rienzi&lt;/strong&gt; | . . .a close examination of the Court’s stated test yields a surprising result: the right to refuse to perform an abortion actually has better historical support, and better satisfies the Court’s stated tests, than the abortion right itself. . .</description>
	<pubDate>2 Mar 2011 01:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal063.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal063.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Freedom of conscience suppressed for Irish pharmacists</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland (PSI) demands that pharmacists must dispense the morning-after pill or refer patients for the medication even if they object to doing so because of concerns that the drug may have an embryocidal effect.</description>
	<pubDate>26 Feb 2011 19:06:27 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Freedom_of_conscience_suppressed_for_Irish_pharmacists</link>
	<category>Ireland-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Freedom_of_conscience_suppressed_for_Irish_pharmacists</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Repelling the attack on concience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Helen Alvaré&lt;/strong&gt; | A new bill is needed to fix the healthcare law’s failure to adequately safeguard conscience.  There is no need to view the matter of conscience protection in health care as a zero-sum game between conscience-driven healthcare providers and the patients they serve, particularly the most vulnerable. . .</description>
	<pubDate>24 Feb 2011 00:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal061.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal061.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Commentary by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Legal Commentary&lt;/strong&gt;The Department of Health and Human Services issues this final rule which provides that enforcement of the federal statutory health care provider conscience protections will be handled by the Department's Office for Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Department's funding components. . .</description>
	<pubDate>23 Feb 2011 23:38:26 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060.html</link>
	<category>Legal Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Regulation 45 CFR Part 88</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;US Federal Regulation&lt;/strong&gt; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:  Regulation for the Enforcement of Federal Health Care Provider Conscience Protection Laws.</description>
	<pubDate>23 Feb 2011 23:41:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws/usa/USA-Law-07.html</link>
	<category>USA-Law</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/laws/usa/USA-Law-07.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Controversial Philippines reproductive health bills consolidated</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Six different reproductive health (RH) bills, all controversial, have been combined in the Philippines House of Representatives to produce House Bill 4244, &amp;ldquo;The Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health and Population Development Act of 2011."  The single bill, which includes a number of passages that are problematic from the perspective of freedom of conscience, will now be considered by the House.</description>
	<pubDate>22 Feb 2011 19:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Controverial_Philippines_reproductive_health_bills_consolidated</link>
	<category>Philippines-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Controverial_Philippines_reproductive_health_bills_consolidated</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Controversy continues in Idaho over protection of conscience law</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Three bills have been proposed to amend Idaho's Freedom of Conscience for Health Care Professionals Act.  The bills are driven by concerns that the Act would permit health care workers to refuse to abide by advance directives.  .  .</description>
	<pubDate>21 Feb 2011 19:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Controversy_continues_in_Idaho_over_protection_of_conscience_law</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Controversy_continues_in_Idaho_over_protection_of_conscience_law</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>CMA Physicians, former HHS Asst. Secretary decry Obama administration's regulatory action on conscience and discrimination</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News Release&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Christian Medical Association&lt;/strong&gt; |The 16,000-member Christian Medical Association (CMA, www.cmda.org) today protested the decision of the Obama administration to weaken the only federal regulation protecting the exercise of conscience in health care. . .</description>
	<pubDate>19 Feb 2011 00:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment02.html</link>
	<category>USA-News Release</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-legal/legal060comment02.html</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>German Medical association proposes change to approach to assisted suicide</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The German Medical Association, which hitherto has considered physician involvement in suicide a violation of medical ethics, has proposed new linkelines that state that participation in assisted suicide is not a medical duty.  This continues to afford protection to physicians who object to assisted suicide.  The approach is being interpreted as a method of providing greater freedom of conscience within the profession.</description>
	<pubDate>18 Feb 2011 19:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#German_Medical_Association_proposes_change_to_approach_to_assisted_suicide</link>
	<category>Germany-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#German_Medical_Association_proposes_change_to_approach_to_assisted_suicide</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Obama administration replaces conscience regulation</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | The Department of Health and Human Services has announced a new regulation to replace one enacted by the Bush administration to ensure protection of conscience in health care.  The regulation will come into force in 30 days.  The Department received over 300,000 comments on its proposal to revoke the Bush regulation, 187,000 of which (62%) were opposed to revocation. . .</description>
	<pubDate>18 Feb 2011 18:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Obama_administration_replaces_conscience_regulation</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Obama_administration_replaces_conscience_regulation</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Conscience protection at risk</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Op/Ed&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;William Saunders&lt;/strong&gt; | In October, at a central European meeting with pro-life colleagues, I learned that in a few days there was going to be a vote in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe concerning rights of conscience. The vote was on the &amp;ldquo;McCafferty Report,” which strongly recommended significant restrictions on rights of conscience. . .</description>
	<pubDate>18 Feb 2011 00:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Protection_at_Risk</link>
	<category>USA-Op/Ed</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/commentary/commentary-2011-01.html#Conscience_Protection_at_Risk</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Members of Congress write in defence of freedom of consscience</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | 46 members of the US House of Representatives have written a letter to the Health and Human Services Secretary to defend protection of conscience regulations for health care workers.  .  .</description>
	<pubDate>16 Feb 2011 18:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Members_of_Congress_write_in_defence_of_freedom_of_conscience</link>
	<category>USA-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Members_of_Congress_write_in_defence_of_freedom_of_conscience</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>Opponent of freedom of conscience would impose eugenic obligation</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;News&lt;/strong&gt; | Julian Salvulescu, a professor of ethics at Oxford University who is opposed to freedom of conscience for health care workers [BMJ, 2006], argues that society has a moral obligation to use in vitro fertilization and screen embryos to ensure that they will have a high IQ (Sunday Herald Sun).  Presumably he would insist that health care workers be compelled to facilitate the process if it were adopted.</description>
	<pubDate>13 Feb 2011 18:22:17 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Opponent_of_freedom_of_conscience_would_impose_eugenic_obligation</link>
	<category>United Kingdom-News</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/media/news/news-2011-01.html#Opponent_of_freedom_of_conscience_would_impose_eugenic_obligation</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
	<title>The Freedom of Conscience Rights</title>
	<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ethical Commentary&lt;/strong&gt; | &lt;strong&gt;Archbishop J. Michael Miller&lt;/strong&gt; | In a world held thrall to what the Holy Father has called the "dictatorship of relativism," Catholic health-care workers must be free to live Christ's message in their professional lives: to be witnesses to the One who is "the way, and the truth, and the life." Without such freedom, we cannot pursue our personal or collective mission to ensure the presence of Jesus' healing ministry in our world.</description>
	<pubDate>5 Feb 2011 00:09:10 GMT</pubDate>
	<link>http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical125.html</link>
	<category>Ethical Commentary</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consciencelaws.org/issues-ethical/ethical125.html</guid>
	</item>
	</channel></rss>

