Christians and civil disobedience
	Evangelical Fellowship of Canada
	Background Paper
	Revised August, 2001
	
				
				
	John H. 
	Redekop*
	Note:  An EFC position paper 
	has been officially endorsed by the Organization.  An EFC Background 
	Paper is a serious document, created by a Task Force or Commission to 
	encourage dialogue within our community.
	Introduction
	A basic requirement for the functioning of civil society, especially in a 
	democracy, is that citizens, generally speaking, should obey the laws of the 
	land.  Christians and most, if not all, other religious groups accept 
	that principle as an over-arching reality.  The logic is compelling. If 
	citizens, in substantial numbers, would take the law into their own hands 
	and individually decide which laws to obey and which to disobey, then 
	anarchy might result rather quickly.  The theory is clear and 
	essentially true but the practical situation is sometimes more complicated.
	What is to be done by responsible and highly moral citizens if certain 
	laws are inherently evil?  What should citizens do if the government of 
	the day pressures them to violate their conscience on a fundamental 
	principle?  What should they do if their government suddenly denies 
	them the most basic of freedoms?  We know from history as well as from 
	the present global situation that Christians often encounter laws which are 
	unjust and simply wrong.  The Christian response is clear.  If 
	individuals and groups find that they cannot agree with certain laws, if 
	they decide that compliance with the law would require them to do something 
	which is inherently evil or which violates their conscience, then their 
	first obligation is to work diligently and peacefully to try to get the 
	unacceptable law changed.  In some situations it has been possible to 
	negotiate some sort of exemption for conscientious objectors.  For 
	example, some hospitals will transfer nurses who do not want to participate 
	in abortions.  In some countries exemptions have been granted to people 
	who object to forced military service or to compuslory inoculation against 
	diseases.
	Sometimes, however, it is not possible to get the offending legislation 
	or government order changed or even to obtain an acceptable exemption. . .
	[Download 
	full text]