Imposing our morality
	Dionysius Dialogues - Morality [2] 
	Nucleus, April, 1994
	Christian Medical Fellowship (United 
	Kingdom)
	Reproduced with permission
				
				
	Dionysius: Now as I recall we 
							were going to discuss the ninth commandment.[1]
							
	Nitpickerus: You were. I 
							wasn't happy that you'd dealt with 'imposing our 
							morality'. You never moved beyond health education. 
							All those statistics about condoms. It was more like 
							a public health lecture than a biblical discussion! 
							Let's get down to the real issue. What do we do when 
							instead of taking godly advice our patients insist 
							on doing the opposite[2] 
							and expect us to go along with it.[3]
	
	Dionysius: Well, for a start, we 
							can't refuse to diagnose and treat them just because 
							they are sinners.[4] 
							We wouldn't see anybody. Where could we draw the 
							line? 
	Nitpickerus: It's not that 
							which worries me. It's when they want us to help 
							them do something which we regard as unethical[5]
	
	Dionysius: Let's have a real 
							example. 
	Nitpickerus: OK. A man wants 
							you to write a doctor's certificate so he can be 
							compensated for the time he's taken off work but you 
							have good reason to believe he's been malingering. 
							Do you write the certificate? 
	Dionysius: Certainly not! That 
							would be deceitful[6]
	and fraudulent.[7] 
							We are not rubber stamps Nitpickerus. We're not in 
							the business of robbery.[8] 
							How do we square that with the biblical injunction 
							to obey the governing authorities?[9] 
							Exactly the same would apply if a patient asked me 
							for a lethal injection. It's illegal. l couldn't do 
							it. 
	Nitpickerus: Maybe it's 
							illegal now, but the law of the land doesn't always 
							tally with God's law.[10] 
							Crime and sin aren't synonymous Dionysius. 
							Trespassing is a crime but it's not a sin.[11] 
							Adultery is a sin but it's not a crime.[12] 
							This is where the problem arises - when the patient 
							wants you to help them sin and the law is on their 
							side. 
	Dionysius: Can you give me a 
							specific example? 
	Who's imposing whose morality?
	Nitpickerus: A l6 year old 
							girl presents having missed a couple of periods 
							after a one night stand. The pregnancy test is 
							positive and she wants an abortion on the grounds 
							that she can't cope with the situation (steady 
							boyfriend, mum doesn't know, A-levels coming up). 
							You believe having thought the issue through 
							biblically that abortion is wrong 
	[13] - so you give a good scientific explanation 
							as to why fetuses are human beings (perhaps with 
							photographs of normal embryology) and offer to help 
							her with an alternative course emotional support, 
							antenatal care, adoption. She won't listen and wants 
							the abortion. What are you going to do?
	Dionysius: Say that I can't help 
							her do it. 
	Nitpickerus: But isn't that 
							imposing your morality? She's not a Christian and 
							she says you're imposing your morality on her.
	
	Dionysius: Who's imposing whose 
							morality? lsn't she imposing her morality 
							on both myself and the baby? 
	Nitpickerus: As a Christian 
							shouldn't you submit to her request - turn the other 
							cheek and all that? 
	Dionysius: Not when it involves 
							disobeying God.[14] 
							We serve Christ - not every whim of the patient.[15] 
							Medicine is not some consumer service where the 
							demands of the market dictate the ethics. 
	Nitpickerus: But isn't 
							showing photographs just emotional blackmail?
	
	Dionysius: I thought blackmail 
							was when you forced someone to do something wrong by 
							threatening them. I'd be telling her the truth out 
							of love and concern for both her and her baby. 
	Nitpickerus: But the law is 
							on her side Dionysius. 
	Dionysius: I think that's 
							debatable. The law says that in this situation 
							abortion is only justified if 'the continuance of 
							the pregnancy would involve risk of injury to the 
							physical or mental health of the pregnant woman 
							greater than if the pregnancy were terminated'[16]
	
	Nitpickerus: But doesn't any 
							legal abortion pose less risk to a woman's physical health than a normal deilvery?
	
	Dionysius: 1 don't believe that 
							was the intended spirit of the law Nitpickerus. 
	Nitpickerus: But it is the
							letter of the law - and you yourslf 
							have said that we have a God-given responsibility to 
							obey the law. 
	Dionysius: We do, but not when 
							it conflicts with Christ's law[17]
							- not when to obey the law is to sin. of 
							course it's not a particularly good example - as the 
							current law on abortion has a let-out clause. 
							There's no legal obligation to fill in the 
							green form or to participate in the process at all - 
							although there is an ethical obligation to refer the 
							patient expeditiously to another doctor. according 
							to the BMA.[18]
	
	Should Christians ever break the law?
	Nitpickerus: Granted, but 
							what if it became a legal 
							obilgation to refer patients to doctors who would 
							authorise abortions? In such circumstances could we 
							justifiably disobey the law?
	Dionysius: Yes, ultimately we 
							obey God not men.[15]
	There are plenty of biblical examples of people 
							who chose to obey God rather than the governing 
							authorities: the Israelite midwives[19]
	(this is particularly relevant to the abortion 
							debate), Rahab,[20] 
							Daniel,[21] 
							Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego,[22] 
							the prophets,[23]
	the apostles.[24] 
							Jesus himself was crucified because he refused to 
							submit to the governing authorities by lying about 
							his true identity.[25]
							
	Nitpickerus: Some of these 
							people got into a lot of trouble Dionysius.
	Dionysius: Men and women of faith 
							usually do. This is exactly why Jesus told people to 
							count the cost before deciding to follow him.[26] 
							Obeying God means that at some stage we will suffer 
							persecution.[27]
	At some stage people will hate us for it[28] 
							and it may cost us our reputations, our careers or 
							even our lives.[29] 
							Sometimes we can see these conflict situations 
							arising ahead of time and defuse them - as Daniel 
							did so masterfully early on in his career[30] 
							(medical students take note!)- but on other 
							occasions we simply have to make a stand and take 
							the consequences. That's what carrying the cross is 
							all about. 
	Nitpickerus: But by refusing 
							abortion to a young woman in that (or worse) 
							situation, aren't we forcing her to 
							carry the cross? Can we really expect her to do this 
							when she has not known God's grace for herself?
	
	Dionysius: Nitpickerus, don't 
							forget that one day this young woman will stand 
							before the Son of God[31] 
							(who laid aside equality with God to die on a cross[32] 
							and have to explain why she sacrificed her baby's 
							life to preserve her reputation and career.[33] 
							You make it sound virtuous to assist her in this. 
							You're right that we can't force 
							our patients to make godly choices - God himself 
							never does this. We need to be prepared to act as 
							mediators of God's grace ourselves[34] 
							- but this mustn't involve giving tacit approval to 
							sin. Jesus offered forgiveness for past mistakes and 
							help to change (and so should we) but his response 
							also included a firm call to a new lifestyle.[35]
							
	But it was the woman!
	Nitpickerus: But if she 
							insists on an abortion, isn't it her choice and 
							therefore her responsibility?[36]
	Dionysius: But if you help kill 
							someone else's baby, then aren't you an accessory to 
							murder?[37] 
							Don't you share the guilt? 
	Nitpickerus: Murder is an 
							emotive word Dionysius. 
	Dionysius: It simply means 'the 
							intentional killing of an innocent human being'.[38] 
							Shouldn't that produce some emotion? I'm far more 
							worried about those who can remain emotionally 
							detached while dismembering a living person. 
	Nitpickerus: But the 
							referring doctor isn't involved in that. 
	Dionysius: You don't have to 
							wield the curette Nitpickerus. If you're part of the 
							process, then you're involved.[39] 
							It wasn't just those who turned on the gas at 
							Auschwitz who were involved in the killing. Those 
							who knowingly drafted the laws,[10] filled out the 
							forms,[40]delegated 
							others to do the killing, transported the prisoners,[41] 
							stoked the ovens[42] 
							and willingly received the tissues for experimental 
							purposes - however noble their intentions - were all 
							involved . They were all guilty - even those who 
							signalled complicity only by their silence.[33,41,43]
							
	Nitpickerus: But isn't 
							saying no to a woman's request for abortion just 
							washing our hands of the whole affair? How is it any 
							better? Dionysius: You' re 
							misusing the metaphor Nitpickerus. Pilate 'washed 
							his hands' in refusing to use his God-given 
							authority to free an innocent man.[44] 
							I'd suggest that the real hand-washers are those who 
							turn a blind eye and fail to exercise their 
							responsibility to do something about it - for fear 
							of causing offence to those involved.[45]
							
	How can we be more involved?
	Nitpickerus: Isn't there a 
							danger of just becoming an armchair critic?[46] 
							Surely we have to do more than just shout from the 
							sidelines?
	Dionysius: We do. If we make a 
							stand as Christians in any area of medicine 
							(abortion is only one example) we need to be working 
							for better alternatives. This will be different for 
							each person depending on their gifts and position of 
							influence but for abortion it may mean being engaged 
							in counselling, helping to set up support networks 
							for women who decide to keep their babies, lobbying 
							to introduce legislation which will give more 
							protection to the unborn, helping to provide for 
							unwanted children, giving financially to those 
							involved in all these sorts of work - as well as 
							being firm in our resolve not to be a party to the 
							shedding of innocent blood ourselves - be it 
							intentional or by default.[47] 
							This is part of carrying the cross too: using our 
							time, talents and money in searching for 
							compassionate Christian alternatives where the world 
							offers diabolical quick-fix solutions - and if 
							necessary, putting our careers, reputations and 
							lives on the line.[48]
	
	Nitpickerus: This discussion 
							of protecting the innocent brings us back to the 
							ninth commandment. 
	Dionysius: Let's save it for the 
							next issue of Nucleus.
	
	References
	1. Ex 2O:16; Dt 5;20 
	2. Pr 15:31,32
							
3. Ps 1:1 
	4. Rm 5:8
							
5. Ex 23:2; 2Ki 17:15; Eph 5:11
							
	6. Lv l9:11
							
7. Pr 1:18,19 
	8. Ex 20:15; Dt5:19
							
9. Rom 13:1-7; Tit 3:1; 1 Pet 
							2:13-16 
	10. Is lO:1-4; Ps 82
							
11. Lv l9:9,1O; 23:22; Dt 
							23:19-21 
	12. Ex 2O:14; Dt 5:18
							
13. Nucleus Jan 1993 pp 
							18-26 
	14. 1 Jn 2:4
							
15. Acts 5:29; Co13:24 [menBack]
	16. 1968 Abortion Act
							
17. 2 Cor 8:21; Ga1 6:2 
	18. Conscientious Objection to 
							Abortion
							
19. BMJ 1992;304:321 
	20. Ex 1:15-21
							
21. Jos 2:2-7 
	22. Dan 6:6-10
							
23. Dan 3:8-18 
	24. Mt 23:33-37
							
25. Acts 4:18-20 
	26. Mt 26:63-66; Lk 22:7O-71
							
27. Lk 14:27,28 
	28. 2 Tim3:12
							
29. Jn 7:7; 15:18-21; 16:1-4 
	30. Mt 5:1O-12
							
31. Dan l:8-16 
	32. Mt 25:31-33
							
33. PhiI 2:5-8 
	34. Mt 25:45,46 [silence
							
Back]
35. 
							1 Cor 11:1; Eph 5:1 
	36. Jn 5:14; 8:11
							
37. Gn 3:9-12 
	38. Pr 6:16-17; Eph 5:6,7
							
39. Nucleus Oct 
							1992:20-23 
	40. Eph 5:11
							
41. 1Ki 21:8-23 [silence
							Back]
	42. 2 Sa 12:9; 1 Ki 21:19; Pr 
							24:11,12
							
43. Dn 3:22,23 
	44. Pr 24:23-25; Ex 23:2,7; Lv 
							5:1; Ob 11; Est 4:12-14
							
45. Mt 27:19-24 
	46. Jn 12:42,43; Pr 25:26
							
47. Mt 7:1,2; 1 Cor5:9-13 
	48. Ex 23:2,7