South African nurse denied position
	Vereeniging, South 
Africa (2004)
	Gauteng Dept. of Health: Kopanong Hospital
	
				
				
    
	
		Note:  The following account is drawn from the
			
pleading submitted in 
her civil suit and the 
minutes of a hospital 
theatre meeting.
 
Sister
Wilhelmien 
Magdalena Charles1 trained from 1988 to 1992 Coronation Nursing College and qualified as a registered nurse.  
In June, 1995 she successfully completed a one year course in 
Theatre Nursing at the Military Hospital in Pretoria. The following year 
she was promoted to Senior Registered Nurse. 
From January, 1997, except during her three pregnancies, she was continuously 
employed as a Theatre Scrub Sister at the 
Vereeniging Hospital, now 
the Kopanong Hospital, becoming Chief Professional 
Nurse in 1999. 
Staff at the Hospital were told in 
February, 2000 that  terminations of
pregnancy 
(‘TOPs’) were about to start in Ward 12.  Sister Charles was among  
health care workers at the hospital who opposed abortion for reasons of 
conscience.  They
presented a petition  on the subject
to Dr. Tshabalala on 25 
May 2000.
In
February 2001, Sister Charles advised hospital 
management in writing that she had become a Jehovah's Witness, and did not wish 
to assist with uterine evacuations connected with abortions.  She noted 
that another nursing sister had agreed to be called out to replace her should 
she be on duty when such a case was referred to the theatre.  She also 
suggested that this situation could be managed by making a second sisters 
available to assist with the procedure in the theatre during the day, and having 
one on call after 1900.  The suggestions clearly indicate that she was not 
seeking to "impede access" to the procedure, but seeking accommodation of her 
own conscientious convictions in a manner that would not interfere with the 
operation of the hospital.
Thereafter, Sister Charles came to feel increasingly intimidated by what she 
perceived as ill-feelings toward her harboured by hospital management.  Consistent with her perception, in
August and in September,
 2001 she was forced to participate in abortions 
despite her protests.
On 
19 February 2003,  Mrs. C. Jacobs ordered her to assist with an 
abortion for a patient who arrived during her night shift.  She did so 
against her will, and the following day she contacted Doctors for Life 
International for help.  DFLI faxed her a  Declaration of Health 
Professional, which she completed to document her
conscientious objection to induced 
abortion; she submitted it the same day.  She also met the 
hospital's chief executive officer,
Mr. Madonsela, who told her 
that her superiors should not have forced her to scrub for the case.
It appears that hospital management decided to deal with the 'problem' posed 
by Sister Charles by holding a meeting of theatre staff to discuss TOP's.  
The minutes of the meeting suggest that a number of the participants had 
consulted one another previously, and that the 'discussion' was contrived solely 
to bring the weight of numbers and authority to bear against Sister Charles.  
The minutes record only one comment from her, reflecting her assertion that she 
felt "very intimidated."  The real point of the 
meeting was  to suppress the exercise of 
Sister Charles' freedom of conscience.  It was summed up by Sister Neria, 
who called for a conclusion to the meeting by asking, "What is the final answer? Is everybody scrubbing 
for evacuation now?"
The answer, given by the nurse in charge of the theatre, was that Sister 
Charles would assist at abortions, and the subject was not to be discussed 
again. 
Further conflict was averted because Sister Charles, again pregnant, asked to 
be reassigned  the following month to avoid stress.  After she 
returned from maternity leave in May, 2004, she was not placed on the theatre 
roster.  The hospital ignored requests from Sister Charles and Doctors for 
Life to reinstate her or to give written reasons to justify its position.  
As a result of the affronts to her dignity and emotional and psychological 
suffering inflicted upon her, Sister Charles finally submitted her resignation 
on 30 July, 2004.  She has launched a civil suit against the hospital.
Update: 2 October, 2006
It is reported that, after a delay of two years, Sister Charles has been granted 
leave to take her case against the Health Department to the Labour Appeals 
Court.
	Notes
	
	1.  Registered nurses in South Africa are referred to as "nursing sisters" and 
addressed as "Sister."  The title does not imply any religious affiliation.